| Model Number |
G23813 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Use of Device Problem (1670)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
| Date of Event |
04/23/2020
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Pma/510(k) #: k163018.Investigation is still pending, a follow up mdr will be submitted to include the investigation conclusions.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
While deploying the zilver stent in the left hepatic duct, the physician mentioned that the markers under fluoroscopy were not obvious and may have contributed to him deploying the stent slightly higher than anticipated.He does not want to make a complaint but felt the lack of visibility of the stent was a contributing factor to the stent being deployed too high.While deploying the zilver stent yesterday, the physician mentioned that the markers under fluoroscopy were not obvious and may have contributed to him deploying the stent slightly higher than anticipated.Additional info received 12-may-2020: the physician managed to reposition the stent just after deployment by manipulating in with spybite forceps during that procedure.Additional file created to capture user error as this device should not be moved once placed.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Pma/510(k) #: k163018.Device evaluation: the zilbs-635-8-10 device of lot number cr1617396 involved in this complaint was not available for evaluation.With the information provided, a document based investigation was conducted.Document review: prior to distribution zilbs-635-8-10 devices are subjected to a visual inspection and functional checks to ensure device integrity.These inspections and functional checks are outlined in internal procedures in place at cirl.A review of the relevant manufacturing records (cr1617396) revealed no discrepancies that could have contributed to this complaint.There is evidence to suggest the user did not follow the ifu(ifu0125-0)."these metal biliary stents are not intended to be repositioned or removed after deployment in the bile duct".It was also noted that the patient anatomy was tortuous.Root cause review: a definitive root cause of user error was identified from the available information.The physician repositioned the stent after deployment.Summary: the complaint is confirmed based on customer testimony.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.Complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for potential emerging trends.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
While deploying the zilver stent in the left hepatic duct, the physician mentioned that the markers under fluoroscopy were not obvious and may have contributed to him deploying the stent slightly higher than anticipated.He does not want to make a complaint but felt the lack of visibility of the stent was a contributing factor to the stent being deployed too high.While deploying the zilver stent yesterday, the physician mentioned that the markers under fluoroscopy were not obvious and may have contributed to him deploying the stent slightly higher than anticipated.Additional info received 12-may-2020: the physician managed to reposition the stent just after deployment by manipulating in with spybite forceps during that procedure.Additional file created to capture user error as this device should not be moved once placed.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|