|
|
| Catalog Number |
0134460 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Defective Device (2588); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Adhesion(s) (1695); Pain (1994); Hernia (2240); Injury (2348); Disability (2371)
|
| Date of Event |
06/09/2014
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
At this time no conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient"; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol composite mesh (composix) on (b)(6) 2011.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the composite mesh (composix).Attorney alleges general allegations for "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient." it is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
At this time no conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient"; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: h11: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided and to correct brand name and (510(k).Root cause is inconclusive; no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-feb-2011) is considered to be a best estimate.Updated fields: a2, a4, b2, b3, b4, b5, b6, b7, d4 (catalog no, lot no, udi, expiry date), d.6b (date of explant), g1, g3, g4, g6, h2, h4, h6, h10, h11.Corrected fields: d1 (brand name), g4 (510(k).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text: not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol composite mesh (composix) on (b)(6) 2011.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the composite mesh (composix).Attorney alleges general allegations for "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient." it is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2011 - patient was diagnosed with incisional hernia thereby underwent open repair with the implant of composix l/p mesh.Per op notes, ¿the patient had a incisional hernia from previous laparoscopic cholecystectomy trocar site.A composix l/p mesh was trimmed little bit and then positioned against the abdominal wall on the inner aspect of abdomen with smooth surface toward the peritoneal cavity using sutures.¿ (b)(6) 2014 ¿ patient was diagnosed with recurrent incarcerated incisional hernia thereby underwent open repair with the removal of mesh.Per op notes, ¿patient had multiple holes in the midline and there was incarcerated omental fat which was dissected with lysis of adhesions.There were a couple loops of small intestine which was completely adherent to the old mesh was debrided and serosal tear was sutured.The mesh was debrided completely along with the edges of the attenuated fascia.Bilateral muscle flaps were raised.¿.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|