• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTELLIS; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR PAIN RELIEF

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTELLIS; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR PAIN RELIEF Back to Search Results
Model Number 97715
Device Problems Shipping Damage or Problem (1570); Charging Problem (2892); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 06/05/2020
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Information was received from a manufacturer representative (rep) regarding an implantable neurostimulator (ins).It was reported that prior to an implant procedure on (b)(6) 2020, the rep was charging the ins.They were able to connect and start charging the ins, but after a few minutes when the ins was at 90%, a reposition the recharger screen appeared.The rep moved the recharger into different positions, but the ins would not charge up to 100% and the same message kept appearing.They tried removing the ins from the box, and kept it inside the sterile packaging and tried again, but the issue still occurred.They then used the same controller and recharger with a second ins, which they were able to charge up to 100%.The rep will be returning the ins that didn't charge to 100% back for analysis.No symptoms were reported.No further complications were reported or anticipated.Omitted information pertaining to other patient device explant - see sr (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received from the rep on june 9, 2020.They reported that on (b)(6) 2020, they got another recharger therapy module (rtm) and tried using it to recharge the ins that wasn't charging to 100%.They were able to charge the ins to 100%.It was noted that they were at home this time rather than in the operating room, and confirmed that the ins was still in the sterile packaging.The rep still plans on returning the to be analyzed, as they don't want to risk using it for another patient and potentially resulting in recharging issues for that patient.They plan on putting it in the mail on (b)(6) 2020.It was also confirmed that the rtm that was originally used on(b)(6) 2020, was given to the patient that had the implant that day, and the rep hasn't been informed of any recharging / rtm issues from that patient.No further complications were reported or anticipated.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H3: analysis of the implantable neurostimulator (serial number (b)(6)) found that there were no anomalies and it could be charged to 100%.Supplemental to update h.6 codes, previous fdm, fdr, fdc codes no longer apply.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INTELLIS
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR PAIN RELIEF
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
MDR Report Key10133627
MDR Text Key194544996
Report Number3004209178-2020-09972
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LGW
UDI-Device Identifier00643169781702
UDI-Public00643169781702
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P840001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 08/05/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/09/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/14/2021
Device Model Number97715
Device Catalogue Number97715
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/29/2020
Date Manufacturer Received07/30/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-