| Model Number |
6478-6-438 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Fracture (1260)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Pain (1994); Injury (2348)
|
| Date of Event |
05/18/2020
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Review of the device history records indicate that devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no reported discrepancies.There have been no other events for the lot referenced.If additional information is received, it will be provided in a supplemental report upon completion of the investigation.Device not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Mrh implant removed, knee revision.Damage was seen on parts connecting the mrh femoral part with extension.Update: "removal of a damaged denture.Fracture and detachment at the femoral and mandrel junction level.Mrh / gmrs knee revision.Exchange on gmrs.Please estimate any surgical delay, even if under a minute : 30 min.The product has been damaged during use, i.E.In the patient's body.The first implantation took place in 2014.The patient was (b)(6).Then the patient reported pain.The decision was made to replace the primary implant.Revision surgery was on may 13 (removal of damaged elements, exchange for new one)".
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Reported event: an event regarding crack/fracture involving a mrh femoral component was reported.The event was confirmed through material analysis of the returned product.Method & results: device evaluation and results:the component was returned fractured at the female threads.Secondary cracking was observed on the posterior portion of the femoral component¿s female threads.A fractured fragment from the female threads was returned.The material analysis reported indicated: the fracture morphology of the femoral component is consistent with a fatigue fracture.Damage on the male threads of the stem was consistent with contact against the femoral component female threads due to bending.Xrf showed that the femoral component and stem were consistent with their respective drawings.Based on the given information, no identifiable material or manufacturing discrepancies were observed on the surfaces.Device history review: all devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.Complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the reported lot.Conclusion: the event of crack/fracture was confirmed through material analysis review which indicated: the fracture morphology of the femoral component is consistent with a fatigue fracture.Damage on the male threads of the stem was consistent with contact against the femoral component female threads due to bending.Xrf showed that the femoral component and stem were consistent with their respective drawings.Based on the given information, no identifiable material or manufacturing discrepancies were observed on the surfaces.The exact cause of the event could not be determined because insufficient information was provided.Additional information including operative reports, progress notes, x-rays and patient history are needed to fully investigate the event.If further information becomes available or the product is returned, this investigation will be re-opened.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Mrh implant removed, knee revision.Damage was seen on parts connecting the mrh femoral part with extension.Update: "removal of a damaged denture.Fracture and detachment at the femoral and mandrel junction level.Mrh / gmrs knee revision.Exchange on gmrs.Please estimate any surgical delay, even if under a minute : 30 min.The product has been damaged during use, i.E.In the patient's body.The first implantation took place in 2014.The patient was 28 years old.Then the patient reported pain.The decision was made to replace the primary implant.Revision surgery was on (b)(6) (removal of damaged elements, exchange for new one).".
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|