• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK INC FLEXOR HIGH-FLEX ANSEL GUIDING SHEATH; DYB INTRODUCER, CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK INC FLEXOR HIGH-FLEX ANSEL GUIDING SHEATH; DYB INTRODUCER, CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number G56228
Medical Device Problem Code Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Date of Event 06/02/2020
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(6).Occupation: purchasing.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.
 
Event or Problem Description
As reported, during an unknown procedure, the valve of a flexor high-flex ansel guiding sheath separated from the sheath.The procedure was completed with another device.The dilator was not in place at the time of the event.Details regarding the anatomy are unknown.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Initial report: as reported, during an unknown procedure, the valve of a flexor high-flex ansel guiding sheath separated from the sheath.The procedure was completed with another device.The dilator was not in place at the time of the event.Details regarding the anatomy are unknown.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.Investigation ¿ evaluation: reviews of the complaint history, device history record, documentation, drawing, instructions for use (ifu), manufacturer¿s instructions, quality control procedures, specifications, and a visual inspection as well as dimensional verification of the returned device were conducted during the investigation.Two devices were returned to cook for investigation.Both had biomatter present on the device and the check flo values were separated from the sheath material.Additionally, both flares were out of round.Additionally, a document-based investigation evaluation was performed.The evidence indicates the product was made to specifications.A review of the device history record showed no nonconforming events which could contribute to this failure mode.As there are adequate inspection activities established, and objective evidence that the dhr was fully executed it was concluded that there is no evidence that nonconforming product exists in house or in field.No gaps were discovered in the manufacturing instructions, specifications, drawing, specifications, or quality control procedures for this device.Cook has concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.An ifu is provided with this device, which states ¿if resistance is encountered during advancement of flexor sheath, assess cause of resistance and consider dilation of any restriction identified or consider alternate treatment strategy.If flexor sheath is advanced through resistance, force to remove the sheath will be higher, increasing the risk of sheath material or hub separation upon withdrawal.¿ the ifu goes on to provide specific instructions on proper sheath removal, including dilator reinsertion.Based on the information provided and the examination of the returned product, investigation has concluded that this failure can be traced to the user not reinserting the dilator prior to the removal attempt per the ifu recommendation.We will continue our monitoring of similar complaints and have notified the appropriate personnel of this event.Per the quality engineering risk assessment no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Event or Problem Description
No additional information regarding the patient and/or event has been received since the previous medwatch report was sent.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FLEXOR HIGH-FLEX ANSEL GUIDING SHEATH
Common Device Name
DYB INTRODUCER, CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
MDR Report Key10138719
Report Number1820334-2020-01105
Device Sequence Number11342591
Product Code DYB
UDI-Device Identifier00827002562288
UDI-Public(01)00827002562288(17)221219(10)10224830
Combination Product (Y/N)N
PMA/510(K) Number
K142829
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source company representative,foreig
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 08/28/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date12/19/2022
Device Model NumberG56228
Device Catalogue NumberKCFW-8.0-35-70-RB-HFANL1-HC
Device Lot Number10224830
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/13/2020
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 06/03/2020
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer08/20/2020
Initial Report FDA Received Date06/10/2020
Supplement Report FDA Received Date08/28/2020
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-