| Model Number |
G43773 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Premature Activation (1484); Off-Label Use (1494); Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem (2906)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199); No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692); Insufficient Information (4580)
|
| Date of Event |
05/15/2020
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Pma/510(k) #: p050017/s002 and s003.Investigation is still pending, a follow up mdr will be submitted to include the investigation conclusions.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Per rep - (b)(6) 2020 - i had a case at (b)(6) (b)(4) this am with dr.(b)(6) and a 6x80 zilver518 deployed in on itself.Used a 6x100 viabahn through the super tight horrible stent malfunction and then used a 6x40 dorado to rupture the stent inside the stent.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Pma/510(k) #: p050017/s002 and s003.Investigation is still pending, a follow up mdr will be submitted to include the investigation conclusions.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
This follow-up supplement report is being submitted due to the receipt of additional information on the 25-nov-2020.Additional information as follows: was the device used percutaneously? yes.Which artery was the stent to be placed in? right sfa.Was the approach ipsilateral or contralateral? ipsilateral.If contralateral, was the bifurcation angle tight? n/a.Where on the patient was the percutaneous access site? right cfa.Details of access sheath used (name, fr size, length)? 6fr x 55cm cook ansel.Was the device flushed through both flushing port before the procedure, as per ifu? yes.Details of the wire guide used (name, diameter, hyrdophyllic)? don't recall and can't tell by angio, but i typically treat over a rosen if.035 or v18 if.018 platform.Was resistance encountered when advancing the wire guide or delivery system to the target location? how did the physician deal with this resistance? no.Was pre-dilation performed ahead of placement of the stent? yes.Was post-dilation performed after the placement of the stent? unable to pass balloon.Viabahn used to reline and then postdilated.Did the tip of the delivery system cross the target location? yes.Are images of the device of procedure available? images of the procedure are available but do not show the device deployment, just the malfunctioned stent after placement.Did the user pull the handle toward the hub during deployment and delivery system was not pushed during deployment? yes.Intial complaint details: per rep - 15may2020 - i had a case at womack (b)(4) this am with dr.Cafasso and a 6x80 zilver518 deployed in on itself.Used a 6x100 viabahn through the super tight horrible stent malfunction and then used a 6x40 dorado to rupture the stent inside the stent.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Supplemental report being submitted due to imaging review being completed on (b)(6) 2020.Per rep - (b)(6) 2020 - i had a case at womack ((b)(4)) this am with dr.(b)(6) and a 6x80 zilver518 deployed in on itself.Used a 6x100 viabahn through the super tight horrible stent malfunction and then used a 6x40 dorado to rupture the stent inside the stent.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Pma/510(k) #: p050017/s002 and s003.Investigation is still pending, a follow up mdr will be submitted to include the investigation conclusions.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Pma/510(k) #: p050017/s002 and s003.Device evaluation the ziv5-18-125-6-80 device of lot number c1662290 involved in this complaint was not available for evaluation.With the information provided, a document-based investigation was conducted.Document review:prior to distribution ziv5-18-125-6-80 devices are subjected to a visual inspection and functional checks to ensure device integrity.These inspections and functional checks are outlined in internal procedures in place at cirl: a review of the manufacturing records for ziv5-18-125-6-80 of lot number c1662290 did not reveal any discrepancies that could have contributed to this complaint issue.The review of relevant manufacturing records confirms the failure mode has not previously occurred with the current lot number.Based on the information available to date, there is no evidence to suggest that there are any manufacturing issues associated with lot number c1662290.There is evidence to suggest that the user did not follow the instructions for use (ifu0043-9).The instructions for use (ifu0043-9) states the following: indications for use: the zilver vascular stent is intended for use as an adjunct to percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (pta) in the treatment of symptomatic vascular disease of the iliac arteries.It is known that the stent was to be placed in the superficial femoral artery (sfa).Image review: images were provided to support the complaint investigation.They were reviewed through cook research inc.(cri) and the following comments were provided by the independent reviewer (ref att.(b)(4) imaging review ver1'): impression.The complaint of concertinaed stent implantation is confirmed.The imaging and report provide no information as to how this occurred.This can happen if the stability sheath is outside the access sheath.This would be possible if the access sheath had been ipsilateral, short, and completed inserted.Root cause review.A definitive root cause of off label use was identified from the available information as the user did not follow (ifu0043-9).Ziv5-18-125-6-80 devices are intended for use to treat disease of the iliac arteries.Information provided by the customer reveals that the target location for this device was the left sfa.It is not possible to state how the device will perform when used outside of its validated state.It is possible that use in a location other than specified within the ifu contributed to the concertinaed state of the stent.Also, the images were reviewed by cook research inc.(cri) who noted that this issue can arise if the stability sheath is outside the access sheath.Summary.The complaint is confirmed based on customer testimony, at the time of the investigation the patient outcome is unknown.If this information is provided at a later date the file will be updated.Complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for potential emerging trends.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Supplemental report being submitted due to the investigation being completed on 07-may-2021.Per rep - (b)(6) 2020 - i had a case at (b)(6) this am with dr.(b)(6) and a 6x80 zilver518 deployed in on itself.Used a 6x100 viabahn through the super tight horrible stent malfunction and then used a 6x40 dorado to rupture the stent inside the stent.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|