• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. G2 FILTER SYSTEM - FEMORAL; VENA CAVA FILTER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. G2 FILTER SYSTEM - FEMORAL; VENA CAVA FILTER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number RF310F
Device Problems Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395); Malposition of Device (2616); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Patient Problem Abdominal Pain (1685)
Event Date 05/17/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturing review: a lot history review was performed.This is the only complaint to date for this lot number.Therefore, a device history record review is not required.Investigation summary: the device was not returned for evaluation.The medical records included images.The image review was documented in the medical records.Medical records were provided and reviewed.Approximately after seven year a computed tomography (ct) show the inferior vena cava filter was at inferior tilted to right.There was a possible migration, but no migration compared to computed tomography (ct) previously.There was a significant tilt with 38 degrees to right as per coronal images and 16-degrees ventrally as per sagittal images.Left lateral strut had entered left renal vein.Right lateral strut was abutting ventral aspect right renal vein.There was grade 3 perforation with ventral strut abuts duodenum with 6mm and left posterolateral strut abuts aorta with 6mm.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the perforation of the ivc filter and filter tilt.However the investigation was inconclusive for the migration of the inferior vena cava (ivc) filter as it was stated "there was a possible migration, but no migration compared to computed tomography (ct) previously".Based on the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documents (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, and unit label) showed that the product labeling is adequate.(expiry date: 09/2012).
 
Event Description
It was reported through the litigation process that a vena cava filter was placed in a patient in conjunction with trauma situation/motor vehicle accident.At some time post filter deployment, it was alleged that filter tilted, migrated and struts perforated into organs.The device has not been removed and there were no reported attempts made to retrieve the filter.The patient reportedly experienced abdominal pain; however, the current status of the patient is unknown.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
G2 FILTER SYSTEM - FEMORAL
Type of Device
VENA CAVA FILTER
Manufacturer (Section D)
BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
1625 w 3rd st.
tempe AZ 85281
Manufacturer (Section G)
C.R. BARD, INC. (GFO)
289 bay road
queensbury NY 12804
Manufacturer Contact
judith ludwig
1415 w. 3rd street
tempe, AZ 85281
4803032689
MDR Report Key10156565
MDR Text Key195221018
Report Number2020394-2020-03947
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DTK
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K062887
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer,health professional
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 06/16/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/16/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberRF310F
Device Lot NumberGFTG3544
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received05/26/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age38 YR
-
-