|
Reported event: an event regarding periprosthetic fracture involving exeter stem was reported.The event was confirmed based on medical review.Method & results: -device evaluation and results: not performed as product was not returned -clinician review: a review of the provided medical records and x-rays was rejected by a clinical consultant indicating: no clinical or pmh, no operative reports, no dated serial x-rays, no description of the event causing the periprosthetic fracture.In this case of reduction and fixation of a periprosthetic femoral fracture without revision of the tha components, there is no evidence that the prosthetic components were involved in the clinical event.Insufficient data is presented to create a medical report for this case.-device history review: all devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.-complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the reported lot.Conclusion: it was reported that the patient had right femoral periprosthetic fracture.A review of the provided medical records and x-rays was rejected by a clinical consultant indicating: no clinical or pmh, no operative reports, no dated serial x-rays, no description of the event causing the periprosthetic fracture.In this case of reduction and fixation of a periprosthetic femoral fracture without revision of the tha components, there is no evidence that the prosthetic components were involved in the clinical event.Insufficient data is presented to create a medical report for this case.The event was confirmed.The exact cause of the event could not be determined because insufficient information was provided.Additional information including operative reports, progress notes, x-rays and return of the device are needed to fully investigate the event.If further information becomes available or the product is returned, this investigation will be re-opened.H3 other text : device not returned.
|