Catalog Number 962702100 |
Device Problems
Corroded (1131); Degraded (1153)
|
Patient Problems
Foreign Body Reaction (1868); Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction (1907); Pain (1994); No Code Available (3191)
|
Event Date 06/05/2020 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
The primary surgery was performed on (b)(6) 2013 via tha for the patient¿s left hip joint.There was no problem at the primary surgery.After the primary surgery, the patient stayed with instructor of ballet and there was aggressive joint activity.It was reported that the patient was diagnosed as having tumorous lesionhad when she was seen in another branch (not orthopedics) because the patient had a pain in the abdomen in 2020.The revision surgery was performed on (b)(6) 2020 by removing the tumor and replacing the liner (p/n: 121889150), the stem (p/n: 962702100) and the head (p/n: 900530210).The cup and the stem¿s sleeve were remained.The surgery was completed with about 2 hours.It was unknown whether there was any surgical delay.The surgeon confirmed that there was extensively pseudotumor around the patient¿s left hip joint.The patient did not have primary pain due to pseudotumor.The surgeon commented that there was a suspicion of armd.He requested analysis of component of the implants because the tarnishing was seemed at the neck of the stem and the head¿s connection.No further information is available.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary : no device associated with this report was received for examination.A worldwide complaint database search found no other reported incident(s) against the provided product/lot combination(s) since release for distribution.Based on previous investigations this complication of joint replacement is unlikely to have been the result of a device failing to meet required specifications.The information received will be retained for potential series investigations if triggered by trend analysis, post market surveillance, or other events within the quality system.Corrective action was not indicated.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary : no device associated with this report was received for examination.A worldwide complaint database search found no other reported incident(s) against the provided product/lot combination(s) since release for distribution.Based on previous investigations this complication of joint replacement is unlikely to have been the result of a device failing to meet required specifications.The information received will be retained for potential series investigations if triggered by trend analysis, post market surveillance, or other events within the quality system.Corrective action was not indicated.H10 additional narrative: added: e1.Corrected: g1 (country code), h5, h6 (device).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.H10 additional narrative: added: d9.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Corrected: h3.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary : update 6-may-2021: the investigation was re-opened upon receipt of the device.Examination of the returned device confirmed the reported event of taper corrosion.Depuy considers the investigation closed.Should additional info be received, the investigation will be re-opened as necessary.Device history lot : the product investigation found no evidence suspecting an error in the manufacturing or material that would be a contributing factor in the reported allegation(s).Where the lot code was provided, a manufacturing records evaluation (mre) was not performed.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|