|
|
| Model Number |
M00534350 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Break (1069); Migration (4003)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
| Date of Event |
05/18/2020
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).The device has not been received for analysis.Upon receipt and completion of the failure analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental mdr will be filed.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Note: this report is one of two complaints that pertain to the same event (mfr report # 3005099803-2020-02322 and mfr.Report # 3005099803-2020-02327).It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a previously implanted advanix-naviflex biliary stent was explanted during an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ercp) with a hurricane rx dilatation balloon in the common bile duct performed on on (b)(6) 2020.On (b)(6) 2020 the stent was implanted successfully.No issues were reported with the device during placement.On (b)(6) 2020, the stent was found to have migrated distally 3 to 4 cm from the duct.According to the complainant, during the unplanned stent removal procedure, a snare was used to retrieve the stent.A hurricane balloon was then used for dilation to implant a new advanix 15cm 10fr stent; however, the stent was difficult to advance in the anatomy.The dilation was repeated; however, approximately 10 cm long of a black piece of plastic seemed to be a radiopaque was noted in the common bile duct when the hurricane balloon was withdrawn from the patient.Reportedly, the detached black plastic piece was retrieved through the scope using a snare.Another advanix-naviflex biliary stent was implanted and successfully completed the procedure.Additionally, it was not certain which of the devices used in the procedure the detached piece came from.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be fine.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Block h6: device code 1069 captures the reportable event of guide catheter break.Device code 4003 captures the reportable event of stent migration.Block h10: the returned advanix rx biliary preload was analyzed.The stent was not returned for analysis.The delivery system was free of obvious kinks and bends.The ro marker was present at distal section of push catheter.No visual damages/defects were observed on the delivery system.The guide catheter was properly attached to the delivery system and tapered section of guide catheter at distal end indicates that it was intact.One unknown black catheter was returned with the device, however it did not belong to a part/component from the advanix-naviflex (stent and delivery system), it belongs to the hurricane device.The reported issue of "stent migration" could not be functionally/visually verified and the stent was not returned to inspect it in order to determine if it presented any damage that could have contributed with reported event.No other issues with the device were noted.The reported event was not confirmed.Based on the product analysis, the device met all manufacturing requirements and no abnormalities were reported during the manufacturing process; after analysis it was determined that the stent was not returned, the delivery system was free of obvious kinks and bends, ro marker was present at distal section of push catheter, the guide catheter was properly attached to the delivery system and tapered section of guide catheter at distal end indicates that it was intact and the unknown black catheter did not belong to the device received, it belongs to the hurricane device.The unit returned did not show evidence of either the alleged issue or any defect that could have contributed to the event reported.Therefore, no problem detected is selected as the most probable root cause for the complaint.A review of the manufacturing documentation for this device revealed that no anomalies or deviations related to the event occurred during manufacturing.A labeling review was performed and, from the information available, this device was used per the directions for use (dfu) / product label.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Note: this report is one of two complaints that pertain to the same event (mfr report # 3005099803-2020-02322 and mfr.Report # 3005099803-2020-02327).It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a previously implanted advanix-naviflex biliary stent was explanted during an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ercp) with a hurricane rx dilatation balloon in the common bile duct performed on on (b)(6) 2020.On (b)(6) 2020 the stent was implanted successfully.No issues were reported with the device during placement.On (b)(6) 2020, the stent was found to have migrated distally 3 to 4 cm from the duct.According to the complainant, during the unplanned stent removal procedure, a snare was used to retrieve the stent.A hurricane balloon was then used for dilation to implant a new advanix 15cm 10fr stent; however, the stent was difficult to advance in the anatomy.The dilation was repeated; however, approximately 10 cm long of a black piece of plastic seemed to be a radiopaque was noted in the common bile duct when the hurricane balloon was withdrawn from the patient.Reportedly, the detached black plastic piece was retrieved through the scope using a snare.Another advanix-naviflex biliary stent was implanted and successfully completed the procedure.Additionally, it was not certain which of the devices used in the procedure the detached piece came from.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be fine.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|