|
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. TAN/FAN PERC DRILL GUIDE; ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
71631021 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Malposition of Device (2616); Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem (2906)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Failure of Implant (1924); No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
05/26/2020
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during trauma surgery intertan tan hip fracture repair.Targeting is off with guide and drop, therefore screws aren't aligning with nail.There was a delay was under 30 minute however the added time keeps the patient under anesthesia longer than necessary.The procedure was completed using the original device and the surgeon changing their technique- to a freehand approach to target screws.No injury reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The device, intended use in treatment, was not returned for evaluation, the reported event could not be confirmed.The clinical/medical team concluded, per subsequent email, the requested relevant clinical information is unavailable.Therefore, a thorough investigation cannot be rendered.Based on the limited information provided, the surgeon¿s change in surgical technique - to a freehand approach to target the screws, and the reported delay of under 30 minutes, did not result in patient injury/impact; therefore, no further medical assessment is warranted at this time.Should additional medical information be provided, this complaint will be re-assessed.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the products failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.A complaint history review found related failures; this failure mode will be monitored for future complaints for any necessary corrective actions.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.Damage from prolonged use, misuse or rough handling are likely probable causes of the reported event.We recommend that all reusable instruments be routinely inspected for wear and damage and replaced as necessary.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.This device is a reusable instrument that can be exposed to numerous surgeries; damage from repeated use can occur.Without the actual product involved, our investigation cannot proceed.If the device or new information is received in the future, this complaint can be re-opened.We consider this investigation closed.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The associated device, used in treatment, was returned and evaluated.A visual inspection of the returned device did not confirm the stated failure mode.The device shows signs of extensive use.A functional evaluation of the returned device did not confirm the stated failure mode.The dimensional evaluation concluded that per inspection of the returned complaint device(s), the radiolucent drop is10 years old and exhibits signs of significant wear/usage - the drill guide is 14 years old and exhibits signs of significant wear/usage.Both parts function as intended.Nothing was detected or determined to be a cause of why the devices are no longer targeting screws correctly.With the parts being as old as they are, it is concluded that the wear/usage on the parts have contributed to the issue stated.The clinical/medical evaluation concluded that per subsequent email, the requested relevant clinical information is unavailable.Therefore, a thorough investigation cannot be rendered.Based on the limited information provided, the surgeon¿s change in surgical technique - to a freehand approach to target the screws, and the reported delay of under 30 minutes, did not result in patient injury/impact; therefore, no further medical assessment is warranted at this time.Should additional medical information be provided, this complaint will be re-assessed.A review of complaint history did not reveal additional complaints for the listed batch.A review of the manufacturing records did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.At this time, we do not have reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.This device is a reusable instrument that can be exposed to numerous surgeries.Damage from prolonged use, misuse or rough handling are probable causes of the reported event.We recommend that all reusable instruments be routinely inspected for wear and damage and replaced as necessary.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|