|
Additional narrative: complainant part is expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation, but has yet to be received.(b)(4).The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.H3, h6: a product investigation was conducted: investigation flow: damage.Visual inspection: the locking device for screw only aiming arm (product code: 03.037.140, lot number: 9918104) was received at us cq for investigation.Visual inspection of the received device indicated that a distal locking mechanism tab was broken off.Thus, the complaint condition was confirmed for the received device.The broken tab was not returned.Device failure/defect identified? yes.Dimensional inspection: the dimensional inspection cannot be performed due to the post-manufacturing damage.Document/specification review: the relevant drawings are reflecting manufactured and current revisions were reviewed.Complaint confirmed? yes.Conclusion: the overall complaint was confirmed for the received device as a component in the device was broken off.No definitive root cause could be determined based on the provided information.There was no indication that a design or manufacturing issue contributed to the complaint.No design issues were observed during the document/specification review.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.H3, h4, h6: a device history record (dhr) review was conducted: part: 03.037.140, lot: 9918104, manufacturing site: bettlach, release to warehouse date: may 10, 2016.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number, and no non-conformances were identified.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|