|
|
| Catalog Number |
0123810 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Device Appears to Trigger Rejection (1524); Defective Device (2588); Material Deformation (2976); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Adhesion(s) (1695); Pain (1994); Scar Tissue (2060); Hernia (2240); Injury (2348); Disability (2371)
|
| Date of Event |
03/20/2014
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention and "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient"; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of unspecified bard/davol composix e/x on (b)(6) 2006 and ventralight st on (b)(6) 2014.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the composix e/x.It is alleged that the patient had revision surgery on (b)(6) 2014.Attorney alleges general allegations for "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient." it is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of unspecified bard/davol composix e/x on (b)(6) 2006 and ventralight st on (b)(6) 2014.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the composix e/x.It is alleged that the patient had revision surgery on (b)(6) 2014.Attorney alleges general allegations for "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient." it is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2006 - patient was diagnosed with incarcerated ventral hernia thereby underwent open repair with implant of composix e/x (device 1).Per op notes, ¿hernia sac was identified in the infraumbilical region and omentum was reduced.A piece of composix e/x mesh (device 1) was placed into the fascia and sutured.¿ (b)(6) 2013 ¿ patient was diagnosed with symptomatic abdominal scarring thereby underwent revision of scar.Per op notes, ¿the bowel was close to surface and intwined with scar.The border of previously placed mesh (device 1) was encountered.The high degree of scarring around umbilicus was left insitu.On right, scar tissue was transected.¿ (b)(6) 2014 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent incisional hernia thereby underwent open repair with excision of composix e/x (device 1) and implant of ventralight st (device 2).Per op notes, ¿previous mesh in the upper midline of abdomen was bulging through the fascia and on all sides, mesh was rolled up and bunched up against the bowel.Adhesions were lysed from the mesh.The old mesh (device 1) was completely excised.Bilateral myocutaneous flaps were created.A ventralight st mesh (device 2) was placed intraperitoneally and secured with sutures.Nonfascia tissue in the midline through which previous mesh protruding was excised.¿.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention and "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient"; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: root cause is inconclusive; no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|