• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION SYNERGY; CORONARY DRUG-ELUTING STENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION SYNERGY; CORONARY DRUG-ELUTING STENT Back to Search Results
Model Number 10632
Device Problem Difficult to Advance (2920)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 04/15/2020
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Patient age: (b)(6).Device is a combination product.Device evaluated by mfr: synergy ous mr 3.50 x 48mm stent delivery system was returned for analysis.A visual examination of the stent found signs of stent damage.Stent struts in the proximal half of the stent were lifted, pulled and bunched in all directions.The undamaged stent outer diameter was measured using snap gauge and the result was within maximum crimped stent profile measurement.The balloon cones were reviewed, and no issues were noted.The balloon wings were tightly wrapped and evenly folded and were not subjected to positive pressure.It was initially reported that the device did not inflate however based on additional information it was reported that there was difficulty advancing.As a result it was decided to complete an inflation/deflation test as per complaint investigations.The device was inflated to its rated burst pressure of 16 atm and then subjected to a negative pressure to ensure full deflation.No issues were noted.A visual and microscopic examination of the bumper tip showed signs of distal tip damage.A visual and tactile examination of the hypotube found no issues.A visual examination of the outer and inner lumen and mid-shaft section found a kink in the lasercut section, 10.0cm proximal of the exchange port.No other issues were identified during the product analysis.
 
Event Description
Reportable based on device analysis completed on 04jun2020.It was reported that advancing difficulties were encountered.Vascular access was obtained via femoral artery.The 75% stenosed, 46mm x 3.8mm, concentric, de novo target lesion with a <=45 degree bend was located in the mildly tortuous and non-calcified right coronary artery.After a 0.014 non-bsc guidewire cross the lesion, pre-dilatation was performed with a 3.5x30 non-bsc balloon catheter resulting to 30% residual stenosis.A 6 fr non-bsc guide catheter was advanced together with a 3.50 x 48 synergy drug-eluting stent.However, the stent was stuck and it failed to advance.The device was completely removed and the procedure was completed with a 3.5x38 and a 3.5 x 15 non-bsc stent.No patient complications were reported and the patient was stable.However, returned device analysis revealed a stent damage.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SYNERGY
Type of Device
CORONARY DRUG-ELUTING STENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
two scimed place
maple grove MN 55311
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
ballybrit business park
galway
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
jay johnson
two scimed place
maple grove, MN 55311
7634942574
MDR Report Key10197015
MDR Text Key196798524
Report Number2134265-2020-07771
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIQ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeMX
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 06/25/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/21/2021
Device Model Number10632
Device Catalogue Number10632
Device Lot Number0024534818
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/12/2020
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 06/04/2020
Initial Date FDA Received06/25/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/23/2019
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age65 YR
Patient Weight85
-
-