This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.D10, h3, h6: the actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once reliability engineering evaluates the device, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Investigation summary according to the information provided, it was reported that during the surgery of meniscus repair,squeezed down the firing trigger, but the plate was not deployed, suspect the internal spring was defect, could not pull the plate out.Tried many times, which result the needle was deformed.The deployment gun and omnispan needle were received and evaluated.Visual observations confirm that the main pusher road was bent.In addition, both implants are within needle channel attached to suture and were not totally deployed.Besides, the silicon sleeve presented a crack.The functional test was not performed due to the damage in the main pusher road, was verified the functionality of the grey trigger and was rough to operate.The complaint can be confirmed.The possible root cause for the reported failure can be attributed to the low tension in the internal spring.However, it cannot be conclusively affirmed.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device [2l06536 ] number, and no non-conformances were identified.At this time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted, as the device was repaired and is fully functional.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family to monitor the extent to which this complaint is observed in the field.Udi: (b)(4).
|