• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DEPUY MITEK LLC US MENISCAL DEPLOYMENT GUN; ORTHOPAEDIC CERCLAGE APPLIER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DEPUY MITEK LLC US MENISCAL DEPLOYMENT GUN; ORTHOPAEDIC CERCLAGE APPLIER Back to Search Results
Model Number 228143
Device Problems Positioning Failure (1158); Deformation Due to Compressive Stress (2889)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 05/20/2020
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Additional narrative: udi: (b)(4).To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.
 
Event Description
It was reported by the affiliate in (b)(6) that during the surgery of meniscus repair, it was observed that the meniscal deployment gun would not deploy when the firing trigger was squeezed down.It was reported that it might have due to the defective internal spring that the plate could not be pulled.It was tried to deploy many times which resulted to the needle being deformed.Another device was used to complete the surgery.There were no adverse consequences to the patient.No additional information could be provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.D10, h3, h6: the actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once reliability engineering evaluates the device, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Investigation summary according to the information provided, it was reported that during the surgery of meniscus repair,squeezed down the firing trigger, but the plate was not deployed, suspect the internal spring was defect, could not pull the plate out.Tried many times, which result the needle was deformed.The deployment gun and omnispan needle were received and evaluated.Visual observations confirm that the main pusher road was bent.In addition, both implants are within needle channel attached to suture and were not totally deployed.Besides, the silicon sleeve presented a crack.The functional test was not performed due to the damage in the main pusher road, was verified the functionality of the grey trigger and was rough to operate.The complaint can be confirmed.The possible root cause for the reported failure can be attributed to the low tension in the internal spring.However, it cannot be conclusively affirmed.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device [2l06536 ] number, and no non-conformances were identified.At this time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted, as the device was repaired and is fully functional.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family to monitor the extent to which this complaint is observed in the field.Udi: (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MENISCAL DEPLOYMENT GUN
Type of Device
ORTHOPAEDIC CERCLAGE APPLIER
Manufacturer (Section D)
DEPUY MITEK LLC US
325 paramount drive
raynham MA 02767
MDR Report Key10202517
MDR Text Key196845360
Report Number1221934-2020-01670
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GEF
UDI-Device Identifier10886705010059
UDI-Public10886705010059
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 06/11/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/31/2021
Device Model Number228143
Device Catalogue Number228143
Device Lot Number2L06536
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/08/2020
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 06/11/2020
Initial Date FDA Received06/26/2020
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received07/08/2020
08/17/2020
Supplement Dates FDA Received07/10/2020
08/18/2020
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-