|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive; no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-dec-2018) is considered to be a best estimate.Updated fields: a2, b3, b4, b5, b6, b7, d4 (product catalog no., corporate lot no., udi no., expiry date), g3, g6, h2, h4, h6, h10.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol ventralight st on (b)(6) 2019.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the ventralight st.It is alleged that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2019 ¿ patient was diagnosed with ventral abdominal hernia thereby underwent open repair with implant of ventralight st mesh.Per operative notes, ¿intraabdominal adhesions and hernia sac in the subcutaneous tissues above the fascia was excised.The ventralight st mesh was placed over the defect and sutured.¿ (b)(6) 2019 - patient was diagnosed with closed loop bowel obstruction with abdominal pain thereby underwent open repair.Per operative notes, ¿adhesions were removed.There were dilated loops of small bowel and soft tissue mainly fat that seemed necrotic and non-viable were noted.The small bowel was decompressed and serosa was closed with sutures and wound vac was placed.¿ (b)(6) 2019 ¿ patient was diagnosed with dilated small bowel thereby underwent fascial closure with internal retention sutures.Per operative notes, ¿the fascia was closed with sutures.The wound was irrigated and wound vac was place.¿ (b)(6) 2020 - patient was diagnosed with dilated small bowel thereby underwent debridement of midline abdominal wound.
|