Manufacturing review: the device history record review could not be performed as the lot number is unknown.Investigation summary: the device was not returned for evaluation.Medical records were not provided.The investigation is inconclusive as no objective evidence has been provided to confirm any alleged deficiency with the filter.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documents (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, and unit label) showed that the product labeling is adequate.
|
H10: manufacturing review: the device history record review could not be performed as the lot number is unknown.Investigation summary:the device was not returned for evaluation.Medical records were provided and reviewed.After sometimes post deployment, the patient presented with back pain.On the same day, an x-ray spine lumbar minimum 4 views showed that a vena cava filter was noted.After six years and two months, a computed tomography (ct) abdomen and pelvis without contrast demonstrated that an inferior vena cava filter was seen.The tip of the inferior vena cava filter was seen in the middle part of the inferior vena cava and just inferior to the right renal vein.Penetration of the leads of the inferior vena cava filter was noted to the surrounding fat, the penetration measured 9 mm.One of the anterior leads penetrated to the duodenal wall.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the alleged perforation of the inferior vena cava.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documents (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, and unit label) showed that the product labeling is adequate.H10: g2,g3,h6(method, conclusion).H11: b5,h6(device, result).H11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|