|
As reported, during a lower leg angioplasty, the hub of a flexor shuttle tibial guiding sheath separated from the device.The product was removed from the package and it was noted that the hub was not secure.The hub separated after it was touched.The package was not damaged.The device was stored by hanging in pull-out shelves.The device did not make patient contact, and another sheath was used to complete the procedure.
|
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unchanged, or unavailable.H6: ec method code - 5: communication/interviews (4111) initial report: as reported, during a lower leg angioplasty, the hub of a flexor shuttle tibial guiding sheath separated from the device.The product was removed from the package and it was noted that the hub was not secure.The hub separated after it was touched.The package was not damaged.The device was stored by hanging in pull-out shelves.The device did not make patient contact, and another sheath was used to complete the procedure.Investigation ¿ evaluation a document based investigation was performed including a review of complaint history, device history record, the instructions for use, manufacturing instructions, quality control data, and specifications.The complaint device was not returned; therefore, no physical examinations could be performed.However, a document based investigation evaluation was performed.There is no evidence to suggest the product was made out of specification.A review of the device history record found no non-conformances related to the reported failure mode.Because there are no related non-conformances, adequate inspection activities have been established, there is objective evidence that the dhr was fully executed, and no other lot related complaints that have been received from the field, it was concluded that there is no evidence that nonconforming product exists in house or in field.A review of complaint history records shows no other complaints associated with the complaint device lot.The instructions for use (ifu), provides the following information to the user related to the reported failure mode: warnings: -if resistance is encountered during advancement of flexor sheath, assess cause of resistance and consider dilation of any restriction identified or consider alternate treatment strategy.If flexor sheath is advanced through resistance, force to remove the sheath will be higher, increasing the risk of sheath material or hub separation upon withdrawal.Precautions: -while inserting, manipulating or withdrawing a device through the sheath, always maintain sheath position.Sheath removal 1.Insert a wire guide until its tip extends at least 10cm past the tip of the sheath.2.Remove the sheath.Avoid applying traction to hub during removal.If resistance is anticipated or encountered during withdrawal of the flexor sheath, consider reinserting the dilator and removing the sheath and dilator as a unit.3.Remove the wire guide.A review of relevant manufacturing documents was conducted.It was concluded that the device aspect in question was visually/functionally inspected by quality control and no related gaps in production or processing controls were noted.Base on the evaluation, the cause of this complaint is component failure without design or manufacturing deficiency.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is warranted.Cook will continue to monitor this device via the complaints database for similar complaints.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|