• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SàRL CAMERA HEAD AC - C-MOUNT; ENDOSCOPIC VIDEO CAMERA

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SàRL CAMERA HEAD AC - C-MOUNT; ENDOSCOPIC VIDEO CAMERA Back to Search Results
Model Number 242401
Device Problem Break (1069)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 06/22/2020
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Udi: (b)(4).
 
Event Description
As reported by the healthcare employee via phone, their rep was there today and noticed a broken wire on the camera head.No case involved.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: correction: h6: result codes: further investigation determined that the result code and investigation summary were both inaccurate on the previous report.Therefore, both fields have been updated accordingly to reflect the correct information.Investigation summary
=
> the complaint device was received at the service center and evaluated.It was reported by the healthcare employee via phone, their rep was there today and noticed a broken wire on the camera head.Per service manual operational and diagnostic, the reported failure was not confirmed.  during evaluation, the reported issue cannot be duplicated.In addition, the display was not presented image.The repair was declined, and it was not restored to the specifications.It is being placed into long term hold.With the given information, we cannot determine the root cause of the reported problem.  a manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device [1801ce0363] number, and no non-conformances were identified.At this time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted, as the device was repaired and is fully functional.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family to monitor the extent to which this complaint is observed in the field.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: d4: the serial number was reported as unknown on the initial report and has been updated as (b)(6).Therefore, udi: (b)(4).H6: method codes: a manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device [(b)(6)] number, and no non-conformances were identified.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Investigation summary the complaint device was received at the service center and evaluated.It was reported by the healthcare employee via phone, their rep was there today and noticed a broken wire on the camera head.Per service manual operational and diagnostic, the reported failure was confirmed.  during evaluation, the display was found defective due to the image was not activated.In addition, the wires were exposed.The repair was declined and it was not restored to the specifications.It is being placed into long term hold.With the given information, we cannot determine the root cause of the reported problem.  a manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device [1801ce0363] number, and no non-conformances were identified.As a potential cause cannot be associated to manufacturing, therefore a manufacturing record evaluation is not required.At this time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted, as the device was repaired and is fully functional.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family to monitor the extent to which this complaint is observed in the field.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: d10, h3, h6: the actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once reliability engineering evaluates the device, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CAMERA HEAD AC - C-MOUNT
Type of Device
ENDOSCOPIC VIDEO CAMERA
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SàRL
chemin-blanc 38
le locle 02400
SZ  02400
MDR Report Key10235565
MDR Text Key202233351
Report Number1221934-2020-01749
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FWF
UDI-Device Identifier10886705028733
UDI-Public10886705028733
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 06/22/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/06/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number242401
Device Catalogue Number242401
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/13/2020
Date Manufacturer Received08/27/2020
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-