It was reported that there was a problem with a katheter from progav shuntsystem.Product was implanted in 2019.In (b)(6) 2020, the patient continued to be comatose and was hospitalized for reexamination.On (b)(6), an intraoperative exploration was carried out.During the exploration, no fluid flowed out of the abdominal cavity.The diagnosis was that the shunt pipe was blocked.Additional information about the patient are not available.
|
Investigation results: visual inspection: small hole in the catheter between the prechamber and the progav 2.0.Permeability test: the test showed that the progav 2.0 shunt system is permeable.During the test was flushed out a piece of deposit.The test showed that the ventricular catheter is permeable.Computer controlled test: the computer controlled test has shown the opening pressure of the progav 2.0, at a reference flow rate of 20 ml/hr in a horizontal position, to be 5.96 cmh2o.This is not within the specified tolerance of 11 cmh2o ± 3 cmh2o.An applied pressure of 11 cmh2o, with the device in the horizontal position is expected to have a resultant opening pressure of 11 cmh2o ± 3 cmh2o.Additional testing did not significantly change the results.According to our results, we can detect a presence of an over-drainage.Additionally, the shuntassistant was tested according to standard procedure in the horizontal and vertical position.At a fixed opening pressure of 15 cmh2o in the horizontal position, a pressure of 2 cmh2o ± 2 cmh2o is expected.The results indicated that at a reference flow of 20 ml/hr in the horizontal position, the shuntassistant® had a pressure of 1.27 cmh2o.This is within the specified tolerance of 2 cmh2o ± 2 cmh2o.The test, performed in the vertical position at a reference flow of 20 ml/hr, has shown that the shuntassistant with a result of 14.26 cmh2o is operating within the specified tolerance (between 13 cmh2o and 19 cmh2o).Adjustability test: the progav 2.0 was found to be adjustable to all pressure settings.The shuntassistant is a fixed pressure valve, therefore the adjustability test is inapplicable.Braking force and brake function test: -the braking force of the progav 2.0 was within the specified tolerance and the brake function operated as expected.Internal inspection of product: after dismantling of the valves, clearly deposits were found in both valves.Results: based on our investigation, we are not able to substantiate the claim of "blockage".However, we assume that the significant deposits found within the valves may have temporarily caused the functional impairment.Deposits caused by natural substances in the cerebrospinal fluid, such as protein, blood or tissue particles, are among the known and unavoidable risks and side effects of hydrocephalus therapy.We can exclude a defect at the time of release.The shunt system met all specifications of the final inspection when released from christoph miethke gmbh & co.Kg.From our point of view, no further regulatory actions are required.
|