• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Model Number RBY4C0630-A
Medical Device Problem Codes Failure to Advance (2524); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Date of Event 06/17/2020
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The product was not returned for evaluation.Without the return of the device, the root cause of the problem cannot be determined.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.This report is associated with mfr report numbers: 3005168196-2020-00910, 3005168196-2020-00911, 3005168196-2020-00912, 3005168196-2020-00914, 3005168196-2020-00915.
 
Event or Problem Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure to treat a type ib endoleak in the in lumbar artery using lantern delivery microcatheters (lanterns), ruby coils, a non-penumbra sheath and a non-penumbra selective catheter.It was noted that the patient¿s vessel anatomy was elongated and tortuous.During the procedure, the physician advanced lantern to the target vessel using the sheath and selective catheter.While advancing a ruby coil through the lantern, the ruby coil became stuck at the marker band on the distal end of the lantern.Therefore, the ruby coil and lantern were removed together from the patient.The physician then advanced a new lantern into the target vessel.While advancing a new ruby coil through the lantern, the ruby coil became stuck at the marker band on the distal end of the lantern; therefore, the ruby coil was removed.It was reported that after removing the ruby coil from the lantern, it was noticed that the ruby coil was damaged and was unable to be retracted back into its introducer sheath.Next, the physician advanced another ruby coil through the lantern, but the ruby coil also became stuck like the first two ruby coils.Therefore, the ruby coil was removed.After the three unsuccessful attempts to embolize the lumbar artery, the physician decided to just fill the endoleak sac with coils.The physician then repositioned the lantern into the endoleak sac and attempted to advance a new ruby coil; however, the ruby coil became stuck at the distal tip of the lantern.Therefore, the ruby coil and lantern were removed together from the patient.It was also reported that after removing the ruby coil from the lantern, it was noticed that the ruby coil was damaged and was unable to be retracted back into its introducer sheath.The procedure was completed using additional ruby coils, pod packing coils (pod pcs) and another microcatheter.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RUBY COIL
Common Device Name
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
MDR Report Key10256305
Report Number3005168196-2020-00913
Device Sequence Number2964045
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00814548013190
UDI-Public00814548013190
Combination Product (Y/N)Y
Initial Reporter CountryGM
PMA/510(K) Number
K120330
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source company representative,foreig
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 06/17/2020
Report Date (Section F) 01/01/2005
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberRBY4C0630-A
Device Catalogue NumberRBY4C0630
Device Lot NumberF87832
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 06/17/2020
Initial Report FDA Received Date07/10/2020
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age61 YR
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
-
-