• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTELLIS; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR PAIN RELIEF

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTELLIS; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR PAIN RELIEF Back to Search Results
Model Number 97715
Device Problems Delayed Charge Time (2586); Malposition of Device (2616); Charging Problem (2892); Communication or Transmission Problem (2896)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 05/25/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Information was received from a patient regarding their implantable neurostimulator (ins).Information was reported that the patient has been having issues recharging her ins since about 1.5 weeks ago.The patient stated it is taking her 2-3 hours to charge.The patient stated when she starts out she will have excellent connection.The patient stated she will lose coupling when she is not even moving.The patient has a pain management appointment on (b)(6) 2020.Additional information was received from the patient.The patient reported that the cause of the recharging issues was possibly the location of the implant.The patient was to have another surgery with present device out and another placed.All equipment to include battery replaced.The issue won¿t be resolved until after surgery on (b)(6) 2020.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received from the manufacturer representative.It was reported that the ins was expected to be returned for analysis.The rep said they did extensive troubleshooting regarding the issue and it appeared it may have been user error since the rep was always able to connect to the ins.It was mentioned the ins may have been initially placed in a difficult spot for charging when the patient was sitting down.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received on july 20, 2020.The patient had reported that they were unable to charge or charging would be inconsistent.They were unable to obtain excellent recharge quality, which conflicts with their original report.They also reported they were unable to charge the ins to 100%.The ins was returned and received in for analysis on august 10, 2020.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis #256042286:analysis information -- 2020-09-18 12:35:14 cst pli# 10 product id# 97715 below is unedited, system generated text based on the analysis finding code(s).The returned device was subjected to a series of standard tests that include but is not limited to visual inspection, output and telemetry testing, and functional testing.The implantable neurostimulator (ins) passed functional testing.H3: analysis of the (ins) (b)(6) found that the ins was functionally okay and had insignificant anomalies.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INTELLIS
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR PAIN RELIEF
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
MDR Report Key10277272
MDR Text Key198915363
Report Number3004209178-2020-12230
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LGW
UDI-Device Identifier00643169781702
UDI-Public00643169781702
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P840001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,consum
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 09/23/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/28/2021
Device Model Number97715
Device Catalogue Number97715
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/10/2020
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/10/2020
Initial Date FDA Received07/15/2020
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received07/20/2020
07/20/2020
09/18/2020
Supplement Dates FDA Received07/23/2020
08/15/2020
09/23/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age59 YR
Patient Weight83
-
-