|
The securacath device and/or catheter have not been returned at the time of this report.Based on the reporter's comments and the fact that the both lumens were noted to be sluggish by may 30th and moisture noted on june 7th there is a possibility that the catheter was partially occluded and the leak may have occurred prior to (b)(6) when the leak was identified.The reporter did provide the securacath lot number and an investigation of component and process history was conducted.No concerns were identified and at this time there is no information to indicate that securacath device failed to meet its product specifications.Extensive engineering evaluations and design verification testing have shown that the securacath device is effective at holding a bard powerpicc catheter in place while not negatively impacting catheter performance.Testing on this specific type catheter has been done and no concerns have been identified.Testing is done with the securacath positioned at the "0" mark on reverse tapered catheters to be the most challenging for flow restriction/catheter compression.Specific testing on bard powerpicc catheters attempted to force a catheter break by purposefully pinching the catheter with the body of the securacath device repeatedly, which would be a worst case scenario of incorrect use of a securacath device, with no catheter failures created.Analyses of catheter leaks reported to interrad medical and to the fda maude database have been performed since securacath has been on the market.These analyses have repeatedly concluded that leaks occur in catheters with and without the use of securacath, leaks occur internally and externally to the patient, and leaks do not only occur within the securacath when using the securacath device, they also occur distally and proximally to the device.Catheter leaks that occur when the securacath device is used are not consistently located and these analyses found no evidence that the use of the securacath on catheters results in an increase in catheter leaks.The most recent search from october 2019 through december 2019 found 83 reports of leaking bard catheters (excluding any involving the extension tubes/connectors).Of those, 73 cases did not identify securacath.The 83 cases occurred in multiple places along the catheter both distal and proximal to the insertion site.Of the 10 involving securacath, the failures appear to have been proximal (4), distal (2), near securacath (2), and unspecified (2) in regards to the securacath device location.Evaluations of returned catheters with leaks to interrad medical have repeatedly found catheter material surface anomalies, wall thickness variations, wall shape variations, and catheter extrusion defects.Given the consistent reports over the years of catheters leaking without the use of securacath and reports of leaks when the securacath is used being extremely low, interrad medical believes that the root cause of catheter leaks are directly related to catheter construction.There have been no manufacturing or design changes to the securacath device within the last 24 months.If the securacath is placed per the ifu and dressed properly afterwards, a catheter leak during use is related to catheter construction and not caused by the securacath device.This represents all of the information that interrad medical was able to obtain at this time.If any new information comes to light in the future a follow up report will be submitted to update this report.
|