|
STRYKER TRAUMA KIEL PROXIMAL HUMERAL NAIL, CANNULATED, LEFT T2 PROX. HUM. 8 X 150 MM; ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
1832-1035S |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Fracture (1260)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Failure of Implant (1924); Injury (2348); Fracture, Arm (2351); Limb Fracture (4518)
|
| Date of Event |
06/20/2020
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Upon completion of investigation, additional information will be provided in a supplemental report.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported: after falling,the patient re-fractured and nail fractured, as well.Revision surgery occurred as a result.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The reported event could be confirmed, since the product was returned for evaluation and matches the alleged failure mode.The device inspection revealed the following: the received humeral nail was found to be broken around the oblong hole at the medial part, as a brittle overload fracture.Brittle fracture results from the application of excessive force to a part that does not have the ability to deform plastically before breaking.A review of the device history for the reported lot did not indicate any abnormalities.No corrective actions are required at this time.No indications of material, manufacturing or design related problems were found during the investigation.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.The instructions for use states: ¿informing the patient the implantation affects the patient¿s ability to carry loads and her/his mobility and general living circumstances.For this reason, the surgeon must counsel each patient individually on correct behavior and activity after the implantation.The surgeon must warn the patient that the device cannot and does not replicate a normal healthy bone, that the device can break or become damaged as a result of strenuous activity, trauma, mal-union or non-union and that the device has a finite expected service life and may need to be removed at some time in the future.Explain the need to report unusual changes in the implantation area as well as falls or accidents even if the device or the site of operation did not appear to be harmed at the time.¿ based on the above investigation, the root cause of the failure is patient related (patient fell).The event states that after falling, the patient re-fractured and nail fractured, as well.If any further information is provided, the complaint report will be updated.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported: after falling,the patient re-fractured and nail fractured, as well.Revision surgery occurred as a result.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|