The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no similar incidents from this lot.The investigation determined the reported difficulties advancing and treatment appear to be related to circumstances of the procedure as it is likely the device interacted with the guiding catheter during advancement causing the reported difficulty to advance.Resistance was once again met with the anatomy causing the reported failure to advance.The device dislodged during deployment and was crushed against the artery wall with a second stent successfully.A conclusive cause for the reported stent dislodgement could not be determined; however, factors that may contribute to stent dislodgement include, but are not limited to, manufacturing damage, interaction with difficult anatomy, interaction with device accessories and inadvertent mishandling by user during dispenser removal.It should be noted that a clinical specialist reviewed the cine and concluded clinically it is not possible to include or exclude the cause of the first stent coming off of the delivery system.It looks as if the stent was stuck on the proximal portion of the previous stent and dislodged the stent.It was also thought that wire position was lost, and the stent was removed from the balloon due to the wire going through a strut.In conclusion from the images provided, we cannot confirm or deny product malfunction versus user error.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.
|