| Catalog Number |
0134680 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Defective Device (2588); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Adhesion(s) (1695); Seroma (2069); Injury (2348); Obstruction/Occlusion (2422)
|
| Date of Event |
02/05/2009
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for the implant of an unspecified bard/davol composix l/p on (b)(6) 2009.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against composix l/p.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for the implant of an unspecified bard/davol composix l/p on (b)(6) 2009.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against composix l/p.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2009- patient was diagnosed with ventral incisional hernia thereby underwent open repair with implant of composix l/p mesh.Per op notes, ¿extensive adhesions in the abdominal region were noted and adhesiolysis was performed.Hernia was identified in the abdominal region.A composix l/p mesh was placed into the peritoneal cavity and sutured¿.(b)(6) 2009- patient was diagnosed with small bowel obstruction, thereby underwent open repair with explant of composix l/p mesh.Per op notes, ¿seroma was found overlying the composix l/p mesh and was excised.Extensive adhesiolysis was performed to correct small bowel obstruction and sutured¿.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-feb-2008) is considered to be a best estimate.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|