|
|
| Catalog Number |
0115808 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Defective Device (2588); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Abscess (1690); Hematoma (1884); Unspecified Infection (1930); Inflammation (1932); Injury (2348); Impaired Healing (2378)
|
| Date of Event |
12/11/2014
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol kugel hernia patch on (b)(6) 2011.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the kugel hernia patch.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: h11: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided and to correct the brand name.Root cause is inconclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-sep-2010) is considered to be a best estimate.Updated fields: a2, a4, b3, b4, b5, b6, b7, d3, d4, d6b, g3, g6, h2, h4, h6, h10, h11.Corrected fields: d1 (brand name) note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol kugel hernia patch on (b)(6) 2011.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the kugel hernia patch.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2011 ¿ patient was diagnosed with large incarcerated umbilical hernia thereby underwent open repair with implant of modified kugel mesh.Per operative notes, ¿the sac was partially resected, and the omentum was transected.In the preperitoneal space, a modified kugel mesh was placed and was anchored in position using sutures.¿ (b)(6) 2014 ¿ patient was diagnosed with hematoma secondary to infection and chronic draining sinus umbilicus thereby underwent open repair with the partial removal of mesh.Per operative notes, ¿in the fascia, there were two drainage tracts.The base of the sinus tract consists of previous sutures were used to repair the hernia as part of the mesh has been partially incorporated.The remnant of the mesh was also removed.¿ (b)(6) 2015 ¿ patient had chronic draining sinus in non-healing abdomen wound thereby underwent open repair with partial removal of mesh.Per operative notes, ¿at the base of the wound, there was a small pocket with granulation tissue, prolene suture and mesh material.The sutures were removed, and the mesh fibers and the tract were debrided.¿ (b)(6) 2017 ¿ patient was diagnosed with infected umbilical hernia mesh thereby underwent open repair with removal of mesh.Per operative notes, ¿a sinus tract in umbilical wound was opened and abscess cavity was found and debrided.A second sinus was found, some of the indurated chronically inflamed tissue was divided and mesh was noted in pocket of pus.All the mesh was removed.¿.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|