• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: THORATEC CORPORATION HEARTMATE II LVAS IMPLANT KIT (WITH SEALED GRAFTS); VENTRICULAR (ASSISST) BYPASS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

THORATEC CORPORATION HEARTMATE II LVAS IMPLANT KIT (WITH SEALED GRAFTS); VENTRICULAR (ASSISST) BYPASS Back to Search Results
Model Number 106015
Device Problems Mechanical Problem (1384); Obstruction of Flow (2423); Failure to Align (2522); Malposition of Device (2616); Infusion or Flow Problem (2964)
Patient Problems Thrombus (2101); Cardiogenic Shock (2262); Thrombosis/Thrombus (4440)
Event Date 07/06/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
No further information was provided.A supplemental report will be submitted when the manufacturer¿s investigation is completed.
 
Event Description
It was reported the patient will undergo a heartmate ii to heartmate iii pump exchange on (b)(6) 2020 due to pump malpositioning and suspected pump thrombosis.Patient experienced low flow alarms during hospitalization.The pump will be returned to abbott for analysis.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the suspected pump thrombosis was confirmed.A migrated cannula with repair was performed on (b)(6)2020.The patient experienced cardiogenic shock.Computed tomography of chest and echocardiograms were performed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturer's investigation conclusion: the report of pump malposition and suspected pump thrombosis could not be confirmed through this evaluation as no product was returned for evaluation and no images of the malposition or thrombus were provided.Additionally, a specific cause for the reported cardiogenic shock, as well as a direct correlation to heartmate ii lvas, serial number (b)(6), could not be determined.The account communicated that the patient was experiencing low flow alarms during his hospitalization.The patient was to reportedly undergo a pump exchange on (b)(6)2020 secondary to pump malpositioning and suspected pump thrombosis.Additional information indicated that the pump thrombosis was confirmed by the account and the cannula was migrated with a repair.The patient also experienced cardiogenic shock.As of the date of this report, heartmate ii lvas, serial number (b)(6), has not been returned for evaluation.This file will be closed accordingly.The heartmate ii lvas ifu lists device thrombosis as an adverse event that may be associated with the use of the heartmate ii left ventricular assist system.The hmii ifu provides details regarding the recommended anticoagulation therapy and inr range as well as outlines indications of pump thrombosis and as how to respond to such events.Additionally, the hmii ifu provides instructions regarding the installation and orientation of the sealed inflow conduit.This document states that care must be taken to avoid excessive angulation of the sealed inflow conduit once the left ventricular assist device is in-situ and the ideal orientation will anticipate that the dilated lv may shrink in size as its workload is assumed by the pump.No further information was provided.The manufacturer is closing the file on this event.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturer's investigation conclusion: the report of pump malposition, suspected pump thrombosis, and low flow alarms could not be confirmed based on the provided information.Additionally, a specific cause for the reported cardiogenic shock, as well as a direct correlation to heartmate ii left ventricular assist system (lvas), serial number (b)(6), could not be determined.The account communicated that the patient was experiencing low flow alarms during his hospitalization.The patient also experienced cardiogenic shock.The patient was to reportedly undergo a pump exchange on (b)(6) 2020 secondary to pump malpositioning and suspected pump thrombosis.Additional information indicated that the pump thrombosis and left ventricle cannula migration was confirmed by the account.It was also clarified that no pump exchange was performed, and the heartmate ii was instead repositioned.The patient remained ongoing on heartmate ii lvas, serial number (b)(6), until they expired on (b)(6) 2020.The relevant sections of the device history records (b)(6) were reviewed and showed no deviations from manufacturing or quality assurance specifications.The heartmate ii lvas instructions for use (ifu), rev.H, is currently available.Section 5, ¿surgical procedures¿ outlines considerations for pump placement and orientation and also provides instructions regarding the preparation, installation, and orientation of the sealed inflow conduit.Section 5 (under ¿inserting the sealed inflow conduit¿) states to ¿select the optimal sealed inflow conduit orientation at the ventricular apex.The following is critical in determining orientation: the opening of the sealed inflow conduit should be directed toward the mitral valve and away from the intraventricular septum.Care must be taken to avoid excessive angulation of the sealed inflow conduit once the left ventricular assist device is in-situ.The ideal orientation will anticipate that the dilated lv may shrink in size as its workload is assumed by the pump.¿ the hmii ifu lists device thrombosis as an adverse event that may be associated with the use of heartmate ii left ventricular assist system in section 1, ¿introduction¿.An explanation of each pump¿s parameters can also be found in this section.Section 6, ¿patient care and management¿, outlines indications of pump thrombosis and how to respond to such events.Section 6 also outlines the suggested anticoagulation therapy and inr range for patient using the heartmate ii lvas.The hmii ifu also contains a section on ¿pump performance monitoring¿ under patient care and management which explains that pump performance is sensitive to changes in systemic vascular resistance and left ventricular filling.Section 4.4 ¿clinical screen¿, contains sections on pump flow, pump speed, pulsatility index, and pump power.Per design, when the estimated flow value is calculated at less than 2.5 lpm, a low flow status is posted to the log file.If the flow remains below 2.5 lpm for 10 seconds, a low flow hazard alarm is triggered.Heartmate ii patient handbook (rev.G) contains a section on ¿alarms and troubleshooting¿ which provides information on all system alarms, including low flow hazard alarms, and the actions associated to resolve the alarms.A section on ¿handling emergencies¿ is also provided.No further information was provided.The manufacturer is closing the file on this event.
 
Event Description
Additional information reported that the pump was repositioned secondary to substantial pressure over time which resulted in left ventricle cannula migration.Revision of the migrated cannula was performed.It was confirmed that the patient did not have a pump exchange at the time.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
HEARTMATE II LVAS IMPLANT KIT (WITH SEALED GRAFTS)
Type of Device
VENTRICULAR (ASSISST) BYPASS
Manufacturer (Section D)
THORATEC CORPORATION
6035 stoneridge drive
pleasanton CA 94588
Manufacturer (Section G)
THORATEC CORPORATION
6035 stoneridge drive
pleasanton CA 94588
Manufacturer Contact
bob fryc
6035 stoneridge drive
pleasanton, CA 94588
7818528204
MDR Report Key10319488
MDR Text Key200431350
Report Number2916596-2020-03507
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DSQ
UDI-Device Identifier00813024011224
UDI-Public00813024011224
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P060040
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 01/17/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date11/08/2021
Device Model Number106015
Device Catalogue Number106015
Device Lot Number6925147
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/06/2020
Initial Date FDA Received07/24/2020
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received09/17/2020
01/03/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received10/09/2020
01/17/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured03/28/2019
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age46 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight138 KG
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
Patient RaceBlack Or African American
-
-