Manufacturer's investigation conclusion: the report of pump malposition and suspected pump thrombosis could not be confirmed through this evaluation as no product was returned for evaluation and no images of the malposition or thrombus were provided.Additionally, a specific cause for the reported cardiogenic shock, as well as a direct correlation to heartmate ii lvas, serial number (b)(6), could not be determined.The account communicated that the patient was experiencing low flow alarms during his hospitalization.The patient was to reportedly undergo a pump exchange on (b)(6)2020 secondary to pump malpositioning and suspected pump thrombosis.Additional information indicated that the pump thrombosis was confirmed by the account and the cannula was migrated with a repair.The patient also experienced cardiogenic shock.As of the date of this report, heartmate ii lvas, serial number (b)(6), has not been returned for evaluation.This file will be closed accordingly.The heartmate ii lvas ifu lists device thrombosis as an adverse event that may be associated with the use of the heartmate ii left ventricular assist system.The hmii ifu provides details regarding the recommended anticoagulation therapy and inr range as well as outlines indications of pump thrombosis and as how to respond to such events.Additionally, the hmii ifu provides instructions regarding the installation and orientation of the sealed inflow conduit.This document states that care must be taken to avoid excessive angulation of the sealed inflow conduit once the left ventricular assist device is in-situ and the ideal orientation will anticipate that the dilated lv may shrink in size as its workload is assumed by the pump.No further information was provided.The manufacturer is closing the file on this event.
|
Manufacturer's investigation conclusion: the report of pump malposition, suspected pump thrombosis, and low flow alarms could not be confirmed based on the provided information.Additionally, a specific cause for the reported cardiogenic shock, as well as a direct correlation to heartmate ii left ventricular assist system (lvas), serial number (b)(6), could not be determined.The account communicated that the patient was experiencing low flow alarms during his hospitalization.The patient also experienced cardiogenic shock.The patient was to reportedly undergo a pump exchange on (b)(6) 2020 secondary to pump malpositioning and suspected pump thrombosis.Additional information indicated that the pump thrombosis and left ventricle cannula migration was confirmed by the account.It was also clarified that no pump exchange was performed, and the heartmate ii was instead repositioned.The patient remained ongoing on heartmate ii lvas, serial number (b)(6), until they expired on (b)(6) 2020.The relevant sections of the device history records (b)(6) were reviewed and showed no deviations from manufacturing or quality assurance specifications.The heartmate ii lvas instructions for use (ifu), rev.H, is currently available.Section 5, ¿surgical procedures¿ outlines considerations for pump placement and orientation and also provides instructions regarding the preparation, installation, and orientation of the sealed inflow conduit.Section 5 (under ¿inserting the sealed inflow conduit¿) states to ¿select the optimal sealed inflow conduit orientation at the ventricular apex.The following is critical in determining orientation: the opening of the sealed inflow conduit should be directed toward the mitral valve and away from the intraventricular septum.Care must be taken to avoid excessive angulation of the sealed inflow conduit once the left ventricular assist device is in-situ.The ideal orientation will anticipate that the dilated lv may shrink in size as its workload is assumed by the pump.¿ the hmii ifu lists device thrombosis as an adverse event that may be associated with the use of heartmate ii left ventricular assist system in section 1, ¿introduction¿.An explanation of each pump¿s parameters can also be found in this section.Section 6, ¿patient care and management¿, outlines indications of pump thrombosis and how to respond to such events.Section 6 also outlines the suggested anticoagulation therapy and inr range for patient using the heartmate ii lvas.The hmii ifu also contains a section on ¿pump performance monitoring¿ under patient care and management which explains that pump performance is sensitive to changes in systemic vascular resistance and left ventricular filling.Section 4.4 ¿clinical screen¿, contains sections on pump flow, pump speed, pulsatility index, and pump power.Per design, when the estimated flow value is calculated at less than 2.5 lpm, a low flow status is posted to the log file.If the flow remains below 2.5 lpm for 10 seconds, a low flow hazard alarm is triggered.Heartmate ii patient handbook (rev.G) contains a section on ¿alarms and troubleshooting¿ which provides information on all system alarms, including low flow hazard alarms, and the actions associated to resolve the alarms.A section on ¿handling emergencies¿ is also provided.No further information was provided.The manufacturer is closing the file on this event.
|