| Model Number |
VCP773D |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
| Date of Event |
07/14/2020
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Investigation summary: it was reported breakage needle.One picture was provided for analysis.Upon visual inspection of the picture, one broken needle and one winding former with seven parks needle of product code (b)(4), lot qamkbt could be observed.However, no conclusion could be reached as to what may have caused the reported incident since the sample was not returned for analysis.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot qamkbt, and no non-conformances were identified.Attempts have been made to retrieve the device.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a patient underwent a radical prostatectomy procedure on (b)(6) 2020; and a suture was used.During the procedure, the needle tip broke when sewing.The broken needle was retrieved immediately.Changed another one to complete the surgery.There were no adverse patient consequences reported.No additional information could be provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).Date sent to the fda: 9/15/2020.Additional h3 investigation summary: a suture needle was returned for evaluation.A fracture was observed near the tip of the needle.The needle was received in two pieces, only one of the mating fracture surfaces was examined for this evaluation.A scanning electron microscope (sem) was used to examine the fracture surfaces and surrounding area of the needle.The fracture surfaces were examined in multiple locations in order to determine the fracture mode.The evaluation of (b)(4) revealed the fracture was composed of microvoid coalescence, which is evidence of a ductile overload failure.This was a ductile fracture.The manufacturing records were reviewed, and the manufacturing/packaging criteria were met prior to the release of this batch.The evidence of this examination indicates that the breakage occurred at the tip of the needle during use due to tensile overload.There is no evidence of any material flaw or defect that would cause premature failure.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon inc, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon inc or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|