• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTELLIS; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTELLIS; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 97715
Device Problems Failure to Deliver Energy (1211); Unintended Collision (1429); Energy Output Problem (1431); Impedance Problem (2950); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problems Inadequate Pain Relief (2388); No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 01/01/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Concomitant medical products: product id: 977a260, serial#:(b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2018, product type: lead; product id: 977a260, serial#:(b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2018, product type: lead.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Information was received from a consumer via a manufacturer representative (rep) regarding a patient with an implantable neurostimulator (ins).It was reported that the patient couldn't increase stim due to a variety of impedance issues on the 0-7 lead.The patient had a fall several months prior to the report, but recently (date unknown) he started having the issue of being unable to increase stim.The device was reprogrammed using the second lead and the patient has multiple programs available.He was still getting stimulation using the unaffected lead.A lead revision is planned, but the physician is not going to do a lead revision until after the risk of covid has decreased.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
The patient noted that starting about 12 months prior to the report or so, the patient does not feel stimulation on their right side.The patient has met with a manufacturer representative 2-3 times regarding this issue.The patient's health care professional told him that the spinal cord stimulation on their right side is not working/sending signals.The patient feels the stimulation a little on their left side, and if they turn up their stimulation, then they feel it in their kidneys.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received from the patient reporting the reason for call was pt reported their hcp screwed their device up and their device never worked right in the beginning or in over 3 years right when they were implanted.Pt stated their representative and one other guy were able to verify 2 different times that one side was not receiving information like it was unplugged and it may have been the problem.Pt noted they did not get a signal on one side and they were going to have to go back there; pt noted they didn't know if the lead needed to be pulled out or if it was broken.Ps attempted to clarify which lead was the issue but pt did not provide an answer.Pt stated their hcp refused to fix their device or the liability will fall on them for redoing it or taking it out.Pt also noted they moved twice in the past month and lost their external equipment and it didn't work and it was "dead" (ps understood this as pt's implant was "dead" since they haven't used their device).Pt noted they were trying to get an mri but now nobody would touch them because they couldn't find information on the implant.Pt disconnected the call.Ps was unable to collect hcp information.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Continuation of d10: product id 977a260, serial# (b)(6)., implanted: (b)(6).2018, product type lead product id 977a260, serial# (b)(6), implanted: (b)(6) 2018, product type lead product id 977a260, serial# (b)(6)., implanted: (b)(6) 2018, product type lead product id 977a260, serial# (b)(6), implanted: (b)(6) 2018, product type lead.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Patient noted the hcp agreed to remove the ins.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INTELLIS
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
glen belmer
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
6122713209
MDR Report Key10331978
MDR Text Key200605077
Report Number3004209178-2020-12945
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LGW
UDI-Device Identifier00643169781702
UDI-Public00643169781702
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P840001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Consumer,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 08/02/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/28/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/14/2019
Device Model Number97715
Device Catalogue Number97715
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received07/03/2023
Date Device Manufactured03/27/2018
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age63 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight82 KG
-
-