Model Number 1008193-20 |
Device Problems
Difficult to Remove (1528); Material Separation (1562); Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017); Difficult to Advance (2920)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 07/14/2020 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).The device is expected to be returned for evaluation.It has not yet been received.A follow up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.The additional ht command device referenced in b5 and d11 is being filed under a separate medwatch report number.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a renal artery.A 5x20mm viatrac plus balloon was placed over a hi-torque command guide wire, and resistance was met when advancing the balloon over the wire.Therefore, it was decided to remove the balloon, but force had to be applied as resistance was met, and the balloon portion separated.The devices were simply removed altogether and it was confirmed that nothing remained in the anatomy.Another balloon and guide wire were used to successfully complete the procedure.There were no adverse patient effects and no clinically significant delay in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Naconclusion code 18 was removed.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a renal artery.A 5x20mm viatrac plus balloon was placed over a hi-torque command guide wire, and resistance was met when advancing the balloon over the wire.Therefore, it was decided to remove the balloon, but force had to be applied as resistance was met, and the balloon portion separated.The devices were simply removed altogether and it was confirmed that nothing remained in the anatomy.Another balloon and guide wire were used to successfully complete the procedure.There were no adverse patient effects and no clinically significant delay in the procedure.Subsequent to filing the initial report, the following additional information was received from the account confirming that the shaft separated, not the balloon portion as initially reported.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device was returned for analysis.The reported difficulties to remove and advance were not confirmed due to device condition.The noted kink was likely due to case circumstances.The shaft separation was not confirmed but noted on the outer member and inner members.The additional noted damage is attributed to interactions with the anatomy.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other similar incidents reported from this lot.It should be noted that the viatrac plus instruction for use states: "if resistance is met during manipulation, determine the cause of the resistance before proceeding.'' the investigation determined the reported difficulty to advance and remove the guide wire through the balloon catheter appears to be related to operational circumstances of the procedure.Based on the reported information, it is likely that the inadvertent mishandling of the device during placement caused the shaft of the viatrac plus to become damaged during advancement through the anatomy and/or other devices used resulting in the difficulty to advance/ remove.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|