• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG SHUNTASSISTANT 20; HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG SHUNTASSISTANT 20; HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT Back to Search Results
Model Number FV251T
Device Problem Increase in Pressure (1491)
Patient Problem Hydrocephalus (3272)
Event Date 07/07/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Visual inspection: no significant deformations or damage of the valve were detected during the visual inspection.Permeability test: a permeability test has shown that the valve is permeable.Adjustment test this is a fixed pressure valve.An adjustment test is not applicable.Braking force and brake function test: this is a fixed pressure valve.A braking force and brake function test is not applicable.Computer controlled test: to investigate the claim of under-drainage, the opening pressure is measured using a miethke computer controlled testing apparatus which simulates a cerebrospinal fluid flow.The valve is tested in both the horizontal as well as the vertical positions.The results show that the valve operates within the accepted tolerance in both positions.Results: first we performed a visual inspection of the shuntassistant®.No significant deformations or damage of the valve were detected during the visual inspection.Next we tested the permeability of the valve.The valve was shown to be permeable.Then we carried out a computer controlled simulated flow test.The measured opening pressure was within the accepted tolerance in both positions.Finally, we have dismantled the valve.Inside the valve we have found a significant build-up of substances (likely protein).Based on our investigation, we are unable to substantiate the claim of under-drainage.At the time of our investigation, the valve was operating within the specified tolerances.However, it is possible that the significant deposits observed inside the valve could have caused the malfunction in the past.As described in our literature, the problem encountered is one of the known, inevitable risks of hc-therapy by shunt implants.We can exclude a defect at the time of release.The valve met all specifications of the final inspection when released from christoph miethke (b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that there was a problem with a shuntassistant.The reporter suspected an underdrainage.Patient information: age: (b)(6) years.Weight: unknown.Hight: unknown.Gender: unknown.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SHUNTASSISTANT 20
Type of Device
HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM  14469
Manufacturer (Section G)
CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM   14469
Manufacturer Contact
joerg knebel
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM   14469
MDR Report Key10337956
MDR Text Key208204269
Report Number3004721439-2020-00155
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JXG
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
K110206
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,user f
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 07/28/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/29/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/24/2022
Device Model NumberFV251T
Device Catalogue NumberFV251T
Device Lot Number20035179
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/15/2020
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received07/15/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/28/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age3 YR
-
-