Additional information has been provided in concomitant medical products and device evaluated by mfr.The phacoemulsification (phaco) handpiece was received and a visual assessment of the returned sample found a nonconforming cable.A flow rate test was performed on the irrigation and aspiration lines of the phaco handpiece, which found the phaco handpiece to meet functional product specifications.The returned phaco handpiece was connected to a calibrated system.The phaco handpiece tuned successfully and completed a five-minute burn-in test with the system set at 100% ultrasonic and torsional power.The phaco handpiece was connected to dynamic tuning fixture (dtf) for stroke length testing on the longitudinal and torsional movements, which found the phaco handpiece to meet functional product specifications.The phaco handpiece manufacturing device history record (dhr) was reviewed.Based on assessment, the product met specifications at the time of release.According to the pennsylvania patient safety advisory abstract: preventing corneal burns during phacoemulsification, march 2010, vol.7, no.1: 23-25, most corneal burns can be traced to issues related to surgical technique and not to malfunctioning equipment.The phaco handpiece was found to meet functional specifications; therefore, the root cause of the reported events cannot be determined conclusively.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|