• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: WILLIAM COOK EUROPE GUNTHER TULIP NAVALIGN JUGULAR VENA CAVA FILTER SET; DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

WILLIAM COOK EUROPE GUNTHER TULIP NAVALIGN JUGULAR VENA CAVA FILTER SET; DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Catalog Number IGTCFS-65-1-JUG-TULIP
Device Problems Difficult to Remove (1528); Structural Problem (2506); Device Tipped Over (2589); Unintended Movement (3026)
Patient Problems Vessel Or Plaque, Device Embedded In (1204); Great Vessel Perforation (2152); Anxiety (2328); Depression (2361)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturers ref# (b)(4).Catalog# is unknown but referred to as cook gunther tulip filter.Occupation: non-healthcare professional.Pma/510(k) k172557.Summary of investigational findings: the following allegations have been investigated: perforation of and embedment in vena cava and migration.Filter interacts with ivc wall, e.G.Penetration/perforation/embedment.This may be either symptomatic or asymptomatic.Potential causes may include improper deployment; and (or) excessive force or manipulations near an in-situ filter (e.G., a surgical or endovascular procedure in the vicinity of a filter).Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: trauma to adjacent structures, vascular trauma, vena cava perforation, vena cava penetration.Filter or filter fragment migration and (or) embolization (e.G., movement to the heart or lungs) has been reported.Filter or filter fragment movement has occurred in both the cranial and caudal direction and may be either symptomatic or asymptomatic.Potential causes may include filter placement in ivcs with diameters smaller or larger than those specified in these instructions for use; improper deployment; deployment into thrombus; dislodgement due to large thrombus burdens; and (or) excessive force or manipulations near an in situ filter (e.G., a surgical or endovascular procedure in the vicinity of a filter).Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: filter migration, trauma to adjacent structures.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.Rpn/lot# is unknown but there is no evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.Cook medical will continue to monitor for similar events.
 
Event Description
Description of event according to initial reporter: it is alleged that "[pt] received a cook gunther tulip filter on (b)(6) 2012.[pt] has suffered damages as a result of cook's actions.In particular, several prongs of the cook gunther tulip ivc filter implanted in [pt] have perforated and were embedded in his vena cava wall.Additionally, the filter migrated within the vena cava with the apex of the filter located in the intrahepatic inferior vena cava (ivc) above the renal veins.Patient outcome: it is alleged that "[pt] has suffered damages as a result of cook's actions".
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturers ref# (b)(4).Investigation submitted (b)(6) 2020 is still valid.E3) occupation: non-healthcare professional.This report is required by the fda under 21cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Event Description
No additional information regarding the patient and/or event has been received since the previous medwatch report was sent.
 
Event Description
Patient allegedly received an implant due to deep vein thrombosis (dvt) followed by an alleged filter retrieval attempt (b)(6) 2018.Patient is alleging migration and vena cava perforation.Patient notes and additionally alleges experiencing "filter implanted tilted and perforated my vena cava; this caused me to live with fear and anxiety.Due to the filter's failure i underwent a surgical procedure to have it removed", as well as depression.Per the (b)(6) 2018 computed tomography (ct): "caval perforation: yes.Grade 2 perforation of the 6 o'clock strut 0.66 cm and the 9 o'clock strut 0.38 cm.Grade 1 perforation of the 12 and 3 o'clock struts.Tilt: yes.7.53 degrees of coronal and 10.14 degrees of sagittal tilt.Apex of filter touches anterior wall of intrahepatic ivc.Migration: yes.Apex of filter is in the intrahepatic ivc above the renal veins.Pertinent negatives: no substantial ivc stenosis.No definite fractured or missing struts".
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unavailable, or unchanged.Investigation: the following allegations have been investigated: difficult to remove, tilt, fear, anxiety, depression.Investigation is reopened due to additional information provided.The reported allegations have been further investigated based on the information provided to date.Physician practice guidelines and published guidance from regulatory agencies recommend that patients with indwelling filters undergo routine follow-up.The risks/benefits of filter retrieval should be considered for each patient during follow-up.Once protection from pe is no longer necessary, filter retrieval should be considered.Filter retrieval should be attempted when feasible and clinically indicated.Filter retrieval is a patient-specific, clinically complex decision; the decision to remove a filter should be based on each patient¿s individual risk/benefit profile (e.G., a patient¿s continued need for protection from pe compared to their experience with and (or) ongoing risk of experiencing filter-related complications).For all retrievable ivc filters, retrieval becomes more challenging with time, and this is commonly due to encapsulation of the filter legs or hook (in a tilted filter) by tissue ingrowth.The filter is designed to be retrieved with the günther tulip vena cava filter retrieval set.It may also be retrieved with the cloversnare® vascular retriever.Cook has not performed testing to evaluate the safety or effectiveness of filter retrieval using other retrieval systems or techniques.The published clinical literature includes descriptions of alternative techniques for filter retrieval; use of these techniques varies according to physician experience, patient anatomy, and filter position.The safety or effectiveness of these alternative retrieval techniques has not been established.Specific for ¿embedded¿ a filter that is embedded in the wall of the ivc may be difficult to retrieve.For all retrievable ivc filters, retrieval becomes more challenging with time, and this is commonly due to encapsulation of the filter legs or hook (in a tilted filter) by tissue ingrowth.Filter tilt has been reported.Potential causes may include filter placement in ivcs with diameters larger than those specified in these instructions for use; improper deployment; manipulations near an implanted filter (e.G., a surgical or endovascular procedure in the vicinity of a filter); and (or) a failed retrieval attempt.Excessive filter tilt may contribute to difficult or failed retrieval; vena cava wall penetration/perforation; and (or) result in loss of filter efficiency.Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: unacceptable filter tilt.Unknown if the reported fear, anxiety, depression are directly related to the filter and unable to identify a corresponding failure mode at this point in time.20 devices in lot.To date, one other similar complaint has been reported against the lot.The associated work order was reviewed.No related/relevant notes were documented.The device is manufactured and inspected according to specifications.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
GUNTHER TULIP NAVALIGN JUGULAR VENA CAVA FILTER SET
Type of Device
DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
WILLIAM COOK EUROPE
sandet 6
bjaeverskov 4632
DA  4632
MDR Report Key10342664
MDR Text Key201763129
Report Number3002808486-2020-00731
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DTK
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K090140
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 10/16/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/30/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date07/11/2015
Device Catalogue NumberIGTCFS-65-1-JUG-TULIP
Device Lot NumberE2945385
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received09/24/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Life Threatening;
Patient Weight104
-
-