| Model Number |
309635 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Leak/Splash (1354)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Chemical Exposure (2570)
|
| Date of Event |
07/08/2020
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Date of birth: only the patient's age was provided therefore a default date of birth has been listed.A device evaluation is anticipated, but has not yet begun.Upon completion of the investigation, a supplemental report will be filed.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that an unspecified number of syringes 5 ml ll w/ndl 20x1-1/2 rb experienced leakage and exposure to mucosal membrane during use.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: material no.:309635, batch no.:9155519.There was a crack in the barrel of the syringe that caused the medication oxytocin which is considered hazardous to shoot out into the employee's eye.The employee was observed in the er and eyes were flushed with water and has had no other issues or tests.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that an unspecified number of syringes 5ml ll w/ndl 20x1-1/2 rb experienced leakage and exposure to mucosal membrane during use.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: material no.: 309635, batch no.: 9155519.There was a crack in the barrel of the syringe that caused the medication oxytocin which is considered hazardous to shoot out into the employee's eye.The employee was observed in the er and eyes were flushed with water and has had no other issues or tests.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The following had been updated due to corrected information: b.6.Relevant tests/laboratory data: observed in er, eyes flushed with water.H.1.Type of reportable events: serious injury.H.6.Investigation: one contaminated sample was received.The sample was reported to contain a hazardous substance, which leaked.Therefore, the sample could not be handled and evaluated.No photos of the reported defect were provided for evaluation, therefore the defect could not be confirmed.Furthermore, a device history record review showed no rejected inspections or quality issues during the production of the provided lot number that could have contributed to the reported defect.Since no photos displaying the reported condition were received and no samples that could be evaluated safely, a potential root cause could not be defined.Since no potential root cause was defined, corrective actions are not necessary.H3 other text : see h.10.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|