|
As reported, during a unknown procedure, the hub separated from a flexor ansel guiding sheath upon removal of the device.Severe bleeding was reported from the sheath.The device was rapidly exchanged for another 8 french sheath.The procedure was completed using a 6 french cook sheath.During the same procedure, another flexor ansel guiding sheath also separated at the hub.That event will be reported under patient identifier 304956.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.Additional information regarding event details, patient anatomy, and patient outcome has been requested, but is unavailable at this time.
|
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unchanged, or unavailable.D10, h3: the device was returned to cook for investigation.Summary of event: as reported, during an unknown procedure, the hub separated from a flexor ansel guiding sheath upon removal of the device.Severe bleeding was reported from the sheath.The device was rapidly exchanged for another 8 french sheath.The procedure was completed using a 6 french cook sheath.During the same procedure, another flexor ansel guiding sheath also separated at the hub.That event was reported under patient identifier (b)(4).A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.Additional information regarding event details, patient anatomy, and patient outcome has been requested, but is unavailable at this time.Investigation evaluation: reviews of the complaint history, device history record, dimensional verification, documentation, instructions for use (ifu), manufacturing instructions, and quality control were conducted during the investigation, as well as a visual inspection of the complaint device.One used 8fr kcfw was received with the hub separated.Biomatter was present.Inspection found two sets of hemostat marks near the flare, which was slightly out of round.No other damage was noted.A document-based investigation evaluation was performed.No related non-conformances were found, and there have been no other reported complaints for this lot number.As there are adequate inspection activities established and objective evidence that the dhr was fully executed, it was concluded that the device was manufactured to specification.There is no evidence that nonconforming product exists in-house or in the field.Cook has concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.The product ifu warns that advancement of the sheath through areas of resistance increases the risk of sheath material or hub separation upon withdrawal and suggests reinsertion of the dilator prior to sheath removal if resistance is anticipated or encountered.The ifu also instructs to avoid application of traction to the hub during removal.Based on the information provided and the results of the investigation, cook has concluded that the cause of this complaint is component failure without design or manufacturing deficiency.The risk analysis for this failure mode was reviewed and no additional activity was required.The appropriate personnel have been notified and cook will continue to monitor for similar events.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|