| Model Number |
87070 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Device Markings/Labelling Problem (2911)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199); No Patient Involvement (2645)
|
| Date of Event |
07/22/2020
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The device has not been received for analysis.Upon receipt and completion of the failure analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the label on the outer package was different than the label on the inner package.A viking catheter was selected for use.The model on the outer package was fixed curve catheter 4e, but the model on the inner aseptic package was fixed curve catheter 10e and the device was a fixed curve catheter 10e an exchange of the catheter resolved the issue.There were no patient complications reported.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the label on the outer package was different than the label on the inner package.A viking catheter was selected for use.The model on the outer package was fixed curve catheter 4e, but the model on the inner aseptic package was fixed curve catheter 10e and the device was a fixed curve catheter 10e an exchange of the catheter resolved the issue.There were no patient complications reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The device was sent to boston scientific for analysis.Visual inspection revealed a mismatch between original outer box (quadpolar) and the returned unit and pouch (decapolar); consequently, confirming the reported complaint.The packaged unit (10-electrodes configuration) matched with what is labeled in the pouch.On the other hand, the box label did not match with the rest of components involved, therefore a deep investigation was conducted finding that not only the batch number of the labels is different but the manufacturing day, determining that as the time interval between both components (box label / pouch label) is considerably large (around seven (7) months of difference).Consequently, there is evidence enough to reject the suspected that the device manufactured on feb 21st, 2019 was packaged using a carton box labeled 7 months later, since it is not likely to happen in the manufacturing/boxing process therefore not confirming the allegation.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|