| Model Number |
DBP-125MICRO145 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Entrapment of Device (1212)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
| Date of Event |
07/10/2020
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Analysis of the reported device is in progress.A supplemental report will be submitted when the device analysis is completed.Patient age is approximate.(b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The diamondback peripheral orbital atherectomy device (oad) was selected for treatment of lesions in the peroneal, popliteal (pt) and superficial femoral arteries (sfa).The peroneal lesion was located within a subtotal chronic total occlusion and was heavily calcified.The oad was operated in the peroneal artery for one treatment pass on low speed, and two treatment passes on medium speed.The oad was stopped between treatment passes to rest and on the first treatment pass on high speed the oad abruptly stopped spinning.The oad was unplugged and re-plugged into the pump, and all leds were illuminated as expected.The start button on the control knob was pressed, and the pump prime rate increased, however the oad crown would not spin.The oad was removed, and it was observed to be stuck on the viper wire guide wire.The guide wire was removed and a procedural delay of over thirty (30) minutes occurred, due to re-wiring of the lesions.Treatment was completed with a second oad and balloon angioplasty.There were no patient complications and the patient was doing well after the procedure.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The reported oad was received at csi for analysis.Visual examination revealed adhered biological material on the driveshaft.Examination of the area of adhered material did not reveal any damage that would have contributed to the material accumulation.The morphology and exact root cause of the accumulation is unknown.A guide wire was unable to pass through the area of adhered material.When tested for functionality, the oad operated as intended on all speeds.At the conclusion of the device analysis investigation, the report that the oad became stuck on the wire could not be confirmed, as the guide wire was not returned for analysis.However, it was hypothesized that the adhered material may have contributed to the device becoming stuck on the wire.The morphology and exact root cause of the accumulation was unknown.The device history record for this device lot number has been reviewed.No issues or discrepancies were noted during this review that would have contributed to the reported event and the device met material, assembly, and quality control requirements prior to distribution.Csi id: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|