|
H10: manufacturing review: a lot history review was conducted and it was determined that a device history record review was not required.Investigation summary: the investigation is inconclusive for the reported balloon rupture, as the device was not returned for evaluation.Per the reported event details, the target lesion was highly calcified.Therefore, it is possible the interaction between the lesion and the balloon contributed to the reported balloon rupture.However, the definitive root cause for the reported balloon rupture could not be determined based upon available information.Labeling review: the review of the instructions for use, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, and contraindications showed that the product labeling is adequate.H10: d4 (expiry date: 12/2022).H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|