• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BAUSCH + LOMB AKREOS INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BAUSCH + LOMB AKREOS INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number AO60P
Device Problems Calcified (1077); Material Opacification (1426)
Patient Problems Calcium Deposits/Calcification (1758); No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 06/17/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
One iol was returned in an unknown small plastic vial.As the original packaging was not returned, the part number and serial number cannot be verified.However, the lens does have the appearance of the reported lens.Particulates were visible on the lens.Visual inspection found the lens optic had been cut or torn in half.One haptic is attached to each piece of the optic.Two haptics have been torn off and were not returned.Microscopic examination found that the optic had a cloudy white appearance and some areas with an orange peel appearance.The lens has been submitted for laboratory analysis.The device history record was reviewed and there are no anomalies or nonconformances that may be related to this event.This investigation is ongoing.
 
Event Description
It was reported that an intraocular lens (iol) was explanted from a patient¿s right eye fourteen months post implant due to residue on the lens.The original implant procedure was uncomplicated.The orientation of the lens did not change.The patient reported a film over their vision did not improve with blinking and would not resolve.The lens was explanted and replaced with a lens of a different model and diopter, using irrigation and aspiration.The surgeon described an abnormal film on the anterior surface of the lens.The patient¿s outcome is good.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A laboratory investigation was performed in an attempt to determine the root cause of the opacification.Through optical inspection, laser confocal microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and electron dispersive xray spectroscopy, it was determined that the opacification was due to the presence of round deposits on the posterior iol surface comprised primarily of calcium and phosphorous.These findings are consistent with historical of the reported lens, opacification lens returns.The opacification of the lens investigated herein from the complaint can best be described as due to calcification.Per publications there are three major types of calcification have been identified.The primary form refers to calcification is caused by factors inherent to the iol design or material.The secondary form refers to deposition of calcium onto the surface of the iol caused by environmental factors (e.G.Changes in the aqueous surrounding the implanted iol associated with pre-existing or concurrent diseases, or due to additional surgical intervention).It is not related to any problem with the iol itself.Finally, the third form is a false-positive or pseudo-calcification in which other pathology is mistaken for calcification or false-positive staining for calcium occurs.Various mechanisms explaining the formation of mineral deposits have been suggested.The underlying pathogenetic mechanisms of delayed postoperative calcification remains unknown and a broad spectrum of biological, pharmacological, technological, and/or certain topical environmental factors may be involved.The product evaluation confirmed the failure mode.There have been no other complaints for this lot to date.It is noted that the inserter used to deliver the lens is not validated for use with this lens.The lot history, trend analysis, risk analysis and directions for use review are considered acceptable, with the product performing within anticipated rates.The most probable root cause is that calcification of the iol is a known procedure complication.No corrective action is necessary at this time.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AKREOS INTRAOCULAR LENS
Type of Device
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
BAUSCH + LOMB
1400 north goodman street
rochester NY 14609
MDR Report Key10373262
MDR Text Key204358606
Report Number0001313525-2020-00101
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HQL
Combination Product (y/n)Y
PMA/PMN Number
P060022
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,user faci
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/01/2005,07/09/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date12/31/2019
Device Model NumberAO60P
Device Catalogue NumberAO60P1950
Device Lot Number1742004
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/28/2020
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/09/2020
Initial Date FDA Received08/06/2020
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received07/09/2020
Supplement Dates FDA Received10/29/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
EZ-28V INSERTER, OCUCOAT VISCO, BSS
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age56 YR
-
-