|
During withdrawal of an 8f.038 avanti plus catheter sheath introducer during an electrophysiology (epo) treatment procedure, the cannula separated from the sheath and remained inside the patient¿s groin.An additional surgery was required and the surgeon opened the groin and the femoral vein, retrieving the broken part.The patient remained hospitalized for two additional nights.The patient¿s status was good, he/she left the hospital and went home.The remainder of the product will be returned for analysis.A photograph of the separated device without the cannula was provided.The procedure was performed via a right femoral access.There was no calcification observed at the access site and it was confirmed by the vascular surgeon who explored/opened the femoral vein for retraction of the separated cannula of the sheath.There were no abnormalities noted when the device was removed from the packaging.There was no difficulty or resistance during prep, insertion of dilator, insertion over the wire, removal of dilator and insertion or withdrawal of any other devices through the sheath.There was also no resistance during withdrawal of any of the devices through the sheath.There was a minor resistance felt by the operator during withdrawal of the sheath.When pulled (with minor force) on the sheath to withdraw it, the valve was separated form the cannula, that remained into the patients femoral vein.The sheath did not kink, or been twisted/torqued prior to the separation.A wire was inserted in order to change the sheath for another longer sheath (sl0 sheath for transseptal puncture).The sheath was in place for approximately 2 hours.Only a bolus of heparin is giving through this sheath.There were no difficulties observed with the device.
|
|
As reported, during withdrawal of an 8f.038 avanti plus catheter sheath introducer during an electrophysiology (epo) treatment procedure, the cannula separated from the sheath and remained inside the patient¿s groin.An additional surgery was required, and the surgeon opened the groin and the femoral vein, retrieving the broken part.The patient remained hospitalized for two additional nights.The patient¿s status was good, he/she left the hospital and went home.The remainder of the product will be returned for analysis.A photograph of the separated device without the cannula was provided.The procedure was performed via a right femoral access.There was no calcification observed at the access site and it was confirmed by the vascular surgeon who explored/opened the femoral vein for retraction of the separated cannula of the sheath.There were no abnormalities noted when the device was removed from the packaging.There was no difficulty or resistance during prep, insertion of dilator, insertion over the wire, removal of dilator and insertion or withdrawal of any other devices through the sheath.There was also no resistance during withdrawal of any of the devices through the sheath.There was a minor resistance felt by the operator during withdrawal of the sheath.When pulled (with minor force) on the sheath to withdraw it, the valve was separated form the cannula, that remained into the patients femoral vein.The sheath did not kink, or been twisted/torqued prior to the separation.A wire was inserted in order to change the sheath for another longer sheath (sl0 sheath for transseptal puncture).The sheath was in place for approximately 2 hours.Only a bolus of heparin was giving through this sheath.There were no difficulties observed with the device.The product was returned for analysis.One non-sterile unit of a catheter sheath introducer (csi avanti+ cardiology ms.038) was received inside of a clear plastic bag.The part was unpacked in order to proceed with the product evaluation.During the visual inspection it was noted that the canula from the device was separated at 10 cm from the distal end.Results from a microscopic review showed the separated area of the cannula of the csi avanti+ cardiology ms.038 unit presented evidence of elongations.No other anomalies were observed.In addition, one picture was provided.The canula of the csi seems to be separated.No other details of the product can be noticed at the picture.A product history record (phr) review of lot 17925607 revealed no anomalies or non-conformances during the manufacturing and inspection processes that can be associated with the reported event.The complaint reported by the customer as ¿cannula- separated - in patient¿ was confirmed during analysis of the returned device.This separation was caused by material tensile overload.The complaint reported by the customer as ¿catheter sheath introducer (csi) withdrawal difficulty¿ was not confirmed since it was not possible to perform a proper evaluation due to the return condition of the device.Procedural factors, such as excessive force used during withdrawal of the device, may have contributed to the reported events.According to the product instructions for use which is not intended as a mitigation of risk, users are cautioned that if increased resistance is felt upon insertion or withdrawal of the csi, investigate the cause before continuing.If the cause of the resistance cannot be determined and corrected, discontinue the procedure and withdraw the csi.The product analysis does not suggest that the reported event is related to the manufacturing process.Therefore, no corrective or preventive actions will be taken at this time.
|