SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD RESURFACING FEMORAL HEAD 54MM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 74121154 |
Device Problem
Compatibility Problem (2960)
|
Patient Problem
Injury (2348)
|
Event Date 01/01/1901 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patient underwent a left hip primary surgery for a bhr resurfacing on (b)(6) 2002 at (b)(6).On (b)(6) 2019 the patient received a confirmation of his cobalt poisoning due to the implants.The patient reported that a treatment including the removal of the devices took place with a different surgeon, nevertheless no explantation dates were provided.The patient outcome is unknown.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
It was reported that left hip revision surgery was performed.As of today, the implanted devices, all of which were used in treatment, and additional information have been requested for this complaint but have not become available.A review of the complaint history for the bhr cup and femoral head was performed using batch numbers in search of similar recurring reports for the products during their lifetimes.No other similar complaints were identified for the femoral head and for the bhr cup.In the absence of the actual devices, the production records for the available dhr were reviewed for the devices reportedly involved in this incident.All the released devices involved met manufacturing specifications at the time of production.Review of the product ifu found adequate warnings and precautions in relation to the alleged failure modes.A risk management review was performed for the alleged failure mode.No additional risks were identified as result of the reported event.No further actions are required at this time.The available medical documents were reviewed.It was reported that the patient underwent a left hip primary surgery for a bhr resurfacing on (b)(6) 2002.On (b)(6) 2019 the patient received a confirmation of his cobalt poisoning due to the implants.The patient reported that a treatment including the removal of the devices took place with a different surgeon.The patient outcome is unknown.Smith and nephew has not received the device/adequate materials to fully evaluate the complaint, but if additional clinically relevant materials are later received, then the case may be re-opened for further evaluation.Without return of the actual devices or further information we cannot further investigate or confirm the details supplied in this complaint, and our investigation remains inconclusive.If the products or additional information become available in the future, this case will be reopened.No preventative or corrective action has been initiated as a result of this investigation.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
It was reported that left hip revision surgery was performed.As of today, the implanted devices, all of which were used in treatment, and additional information have been requested for this complaint but have not become available.A review of the complaint history for the bhr cup and femoral head was performed using batch numbers in search of similar recurring reports for the products during their lifetimes.No other similar complaints were identified for the femoral head and for the bhr cup.In the absence of the actual devices, the production records for the available dhr were reviewed for the devices reportedly involved in this incident.All the released devices involved met manufacturing specifications at the time of production.Review of the product ifu found adequate warnings and precautions in relation to the alleged failure modes.A risk management review was performed for the alleged failure mode.No additional risks were identified as result of the reported event.No further actions are required at this time.The available medical documents were reviewed.It was reported that the patient underwent a left hip primary surgery for a bhr resurfacing on (b)(6) 2002.On (b)(6) 2019 the patient received a confirmation of his cobalt poisoning due to the implants.The patient reported that a treatment including the removal of the devices took place with a different surgeon.The patient outcome is unknown.Smith and nephew has not received the device/adequate materials to fully evaluate the complaint, but if additional clinically relevant materials are later received, then the case may be re-opened for further evaluation.Without return of the actual devices or further information we cannot further investigate or confirm the details supplied in this complaint, and our investigation remains inconclusive.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|