|
Investigation results were made available.Event description: it was reported that the patient was implanted with a total hip prosthesis in 2007 and was revised on (b)(6) 2020 due to pain and femoral loosening.Moreover, the stem was clearly undersized and placed in varus alignment.Additionally, it is reported that there were areas of reduced bone density behind the cup, superior and medial, and possibly a cyst at the most superior and lateral rim of the acetabulum.Intraoperatively, the cup was found to be well fixed and stayed in-situ.The liner was found to be burnished (polished by rubbing).Liner, head and stem were revised.Review of received data: - due diligence: no further due diligence required as all required information to support the conclusion was already requested.- x-ray: four separate images labeled left hip were received and reviewed by hcp.Assessment of imaging: image four demonstrates a left total hip arthroplasty with cement fixation of the acetabular cup.Symmetric position of the femoral head within the acetabular cup.Radiolucency surrounding the femoral stem suggesting loosening.Heterotopic ossification extending along the femoral neck likely causing limited range of motion.Image three demonstrates a left total hip arthroplasty with cement fixation of the acetabular cup.Symmetric position of the femoral head within the acetabular cup.Radiolucency surrounding the femoral stem suggesting loosening.Heterotopic ossification extending along the femoral neck is likely reducing range of motion.Image two demonstrates tip of the femoral stem which is normal.Minimal radiolucency along the cement hardware interface.Image one demonstrates rounded lucency along the superior acetabulum suggesting possible osteolysis.Impressions: left total hip arthroplasty with evidence of loosening of the femoral stem and osteolysis of one of the acetabular cups.Overall fit of the implant is appropriate.There is varus positioning of the femoral stem.Mild osteopenia.Loosening of the femoral stem is seen on all images.Rounded lucency along the superior acetabulum is seen on image 1 and image 4, possibly evidence of osteolysis.Acetabular inclination angles cannot be accurately measured without a true ap pelvis film.However, visually, the acetabular cups appear to be in appropriate position.Product evaluation: no product was returned; therefore, visual and dimensional evaluation could not be performed.Review of product documentation: - device purpose: this device is intended for treatment.- product compatibility: the compatibility check could not be performed due to missing product identification.- dhr review: review of the device history records could not be performed due to missing lot number.Conclusion: it was reported that the patient was implanted with a total hip prosthesis in 2007 and was revised on (b)(6) 2020 due to pain and femoral loosening.Moreover, the stem was clearly undersized and placed in varus alignment.Additionally, it is reported that there were areas of reduced bone density behind the cup, superior and medial, and possibly a cyst at the most superior and lateral rim of the acetabulum.Intraoperatively, the cup was found to be well fixed and stayed in-situ.The liner was found to be burnished (polished by rubbing).Liner, head and stem were revised.Neither the retrieval nor photos of the device were received; therefore, the condition of the component is unknown.Patient factors that may have affected the performance of the components such as bone quality, activity level, type of activity and relevant medical history are unknown.Based on the investigation the reported event can be confirmed.The x-ray reviewed confirmed the loosening of the stem and the varus positioning.Due to the unknown lot number the manufacturing documents could not be reviewed, nevertheless based on the given information there is no indication of a non-conformance or complaint out of box (coob).Based on the given information and the results of the investigation, we were not able to identify a specific root cause for this issue.The need for corrective measures is not indicated and zimmer switzerland manufacturing gmbh considers this case as closed.Zimmer biomet's reference number of this file is (b)(4).
|