|
H.6.Investigation findings: code 213 - an explant evaluation was performed for this device.The evaluation found the following: a gore® excluder® aaa endoprosthesis was implanted to treat an abdominal aortic aneurysm on (b)(6) 2021.The following information regarding this event was provided to w.L.Gore & associates: on (b)(6) 2020, the patient underwent endovascular repair using gore® excluder® aaa endoprostheses.It was reported that the patient had previously placed stent grafts (type and location not provided).The patient's anatomy was reported as tortuous and highly calcified through the aorta and iliac arteries.It was reported that when the trunk of the trunk-ipsilateral leg component was deployed, the contralateral leg gate became compressed due to its placement in a highly tortuous and calcified area of the anatomy.The contralateral leg gate was unable to be cannulated.It was reported that the physician converted to an open procedure.The trunk-ipsilateral leg component was explanted.Upon explant it was noted that the contralateral leg gate was crushed.The crushed contralateral leg gate was attributed solely to patient anatomy.There were no further reported issues.The patient tolerated the procedure.The device was returned to w.L.Gore & associates for investigation.Submitted unfixed was one gore® excluder® aaa endoprosthesis trunk ¿ ipsilateral leg endoprosthesis (trunk).The lumina of the device were widely patent.The luminal and abluminal device surfaces were generally devoid of tissue except for scattered plaques of friable red/brown material consistent with coagulated/sedimented blood.The contralateral (cl) gate appeared narrowed, primarily in the mid region, in the anterior/posterior (a/p) plane.A fragment of clear rectangular material was loosely adhered to the wall of the cl gate albumen.Later identified as silicone resin via ftir.Radiographs were overall unremarkable except for the apparent narrowing of the cl gate.The device was submerged in a saline bath heated to 37°c for five minutes to allow the nitinol to reach desired environment for expansion.The cl gate a/p width increased to approximately 10mm in outer diameter.Histopathological examination was not performed due to the lack of fixation and paucity of adherent tissue.The device was subjected to an enzymatic digestion process to remove biologic debris.Following digestion the device was examined for material disruptions with the aid of a stereomicroscope, scanning electron microscopy (sem) and fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ftir).Multifocal filaments/clusters of fine shiny translucent foreign material were loosely adhered to the luminal surface material.Sem analysis of luminal material surface had typical eptfe microstructure for this device and was unremarkable.The remaining foreign filaments were visible and appeared to be sitting on the surface of the graft material with no evidence of interaction with the eptfe graft material; as such it is unlikely they played a role in the inability for the device to fully deploy in situ.Ftir identified some of the filaments/clusters as a polypropylene-like material and others as polyethylene-like material.These materials are not part of the manufacturing process.The exact material source could not be determined; however, these materials are common in surgical accessories (e.G., surgical drapes, absorbent pads) and were likely introduced during the explant procedure or subsequent handling.There were no material findings which could be attributed to the inability of the device to fully deploy.No wear related disruptions were identified.According to the gore® excluder® aaa endoprosthesis instructions for use (ifu), potential device or procedure related adverse events that may occur and/or require intervention or additional intraoperative procedure time include, but are not limited to, incomplete component deployment.Furthermore, additional considerations for patient selection, and anatomical requirements for use of the trunk-ipsilateral leg endoprosthesis include, but are not limited to, minimal thrombus or calcification in the proximal aortic neck, and infrarenal aortic neck treatment diameter range of 19 ¿ 32 mm.H.6.Investigation findings: code 3233 updated to code 213.H.6.Investigation conclusions: code 11 updated to code 50.
|