|
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for this medwatch, a supplemental medwatch report will be filed as appropriate.Device evaluation: this device was returned for service; however, did not meet manufacturing specifications during pre-repair assessment.During repair, an evaluation was performed and it was determined that the device ran in locked position.It was further determined that the mid assembly, locking mechanism, and back end subassembly had corrosion.It was observed that the device had a cosmetic damage ¿ worn.It was further determined that the device failed pretest for cutter brake assessment.Therefore, the reported condition was confirmed.The assignable root cause was determined to be traced to user, which is user error.If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch report will be submitted accordingly.(b)(4).
|
|
It was reported that during service and repair pre-testing, it was discovered that the attachment device ran in locked position.The event was not related to surgery.There was no patient involvement.There were no injuries or medical intervention associated with this event.The exact date of the event was unknown.However, it was reported that the event occurred in 2020.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch report will be submitted accordingly.
|