| Catalog Number |
5950020 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Defective Device (2588); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Adhesion(s) (1695); Hernia (2240); Injury (2348); Disability (2371)
|
| Date of Event |
04/19/2017
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient including permanent injury, hernia recurrence and surgical intervention.The instructions-for-use supplied with the device lists hernia recurrence as a possible complication.However, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol ventrio st on (b)(6) 2014.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the ventrio st.Attorney alleges that the mesh product was explanted on (b)(6) 2017 and recurrent ventral hernia repaired with abdominal wall reconstruction on (b)(6) 2019.Attorney alleges general allegations for ¿past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient." it is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient including permanent injury, hernia recurrence and surgical intervention.The instructions-for-use supplied with the device lists hernia recurrence as a possible complication.However, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol ventrio st on (b)(6) 2014.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the ventrio st.Attorney alleges that the mesh product was explanted on (b)(6) 2017 and recurrent ventral hernia repaired with abdominal wall reconstruction on (b)(6) 2019.Attorney alleges general allegations for ¿past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient." it is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2014 - patient was diagnosed with incisional hernia thereby underwent open repair with implant of ventrio st mesh.Per op notes, "a ventrio st mesh was placed and sutured." (b)(6) 2017 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent incisional hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic converted to open repair with explant of ventrio st mesh.Per op notes, "the old ventrio st mesh adherent to the bowel was resected and removed.".
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|