|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of unspecified bard/davol 3dmax mesh and 3dmax light mesh.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the 3dmax mesh which was implanted on (b)(6) 2017.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2017 ¿ patient was diagnosed with bilateral inguinal hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with implant of 3dmax light mesh (device #1, #2).Per operative notes, ¿an indirect inguinal hernia was noted bilaterally.A medium sized right sided 3dmax light mesh (device #1) was placed into defect and sutures.A similar sized 3dmax light mesh (device #2) was placed on left side to cover the hernial orifice and secured using sutures.¿ (b)(6) 2017 ¿ patient was diagnosed with recurrent left inguinal hernia thereby underwent open repair.Per operative notes, ¿the hernia was recurred behind posterior edge of previous mesh (device #2).A synthetic plug and patch was placed and sutured.¿.
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: h11: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided and to correct the brand name and pma/510(k) #.Root cause is inconclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Updated fields: a2, b3, b4, b5, b6, b7, d4 (product catalog no, udi no), g3, g6, h2, h6, h10, h11.Corrected field: d1(brand name), g4(pma/510(k) #).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|