• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643 3DMAX LIGHT; SURGICAL MESH

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643 3DMAX LIGHT; SURGICAL MESH Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 0117310
Medical Device Problem Codes Defective Device (2588); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Hernia (2240); Injury (2348)
Date of Event 12/22/2017
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
 
Event or Problem Description
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of unspecified bard/davol 3dmax mesh and 3dmax light mesh.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the 3dmax mesh which was implanted on (b)(6) 2017.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
 
Event or Problem Description
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of unspecified bard/davol 3dmax mesh and 3dmax light mesh.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the 3dmax mesh which was implanted on (b)(6) 2017.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2017 ¿ patient was diagnosed with bilateral inguinal hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with implant of 3dmax light mesh (device #1, #2).Per operative notes, ¿an indirect inguinal hernia was noted bilaterally.A medium sized right sided 3dmax light mesh (device #1) was placed into defect and sutures.A similar sized 3dmax light mesh (device #2) was placed on left side to cover the hernial orifice and secured using sutures.¿ (b)(6) 2017 ¿ patient was diagnosed with recurrent left inguinal hernia thereby underwent open repair.Per operative notes, ¿the hernia was recurred behind posterior edge of previous mesh (device #2).A synthetic plug and patch was placed and sutured.¿.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: h11: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided and to correct the brand name and pma/510(k) #.Root cause is inconclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Updated fields: a2, b3, b4, b5, b6, b7, d4 (product catalog no, udi no), g3, g6, h2, h6, h10, h11.Corrected field: d1(brand name), g4(pma/510(k) #).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
3DMAX LIGHT
Common Device Name
SURGICAL MESH
Manufacturer (Section D)
DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643
100 crossings blvd.
warwick RI 02886
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD SHANNON LIMITED 3005636544
san geronimo industrial park
lot #1, road #3, km 79.7
humacao PR 00791
Manufacturer Contact
andrew topoulos
100 crossings blvd.
warwick, RI 02886
4018258495
MDR Report Key10406022
Report Number1213643-2020-07402
Device Sequence Number16924111
Product Code FTL
UDI-Device Identifier00801741031021
UDI-Public(01)00801741031021
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateIL
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K091659
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2017
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Consumer
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 08/08/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number0117310
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 08/07/2020
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer07/17/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date08/14/2020
Supplement Report FDA Received Date08/08/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age65 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-