| Catalog Number |
5950010 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Defective Device (2588); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Abdominal Pain (1685); Adhesion(s) (1695); Hernia (2240); Injury (2348)
|
| Date of Event |
09/04/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol ventrio st on (b)(6) 2011.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against ventrio st.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-jun-2011) is considered to be a best estimate.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol ventrio st on (b)(6) 2011.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against ventrio st.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2011 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent ventral hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with implant of ventrio st.Per op notes, ¿the hernia sac was identified with incarcerated peritoneal fat was excised.The sac was reduced.A ventrio st mesh was placed using prolene sutures and tacked.¿ (b)(6) 2019 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent ventral hernia with abdominal pain thereby underwent open repair with excision of ventrio st and implant of synthetic mesh.Per op notes, ¿the hernia sac was identified, dissected and opened.The omentum adherent to prior mesh was taken down.The prior mesh with metal tacks were removed and excised entirely.A synthetic mesh was placed and sutured.¿.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|