Additional information provided in d.10., h.3., h.6., and h.10.A review of the device history record traceable to the reported lot number indicates that the product was processed and released according to the product¿s acceptance criteria.One opened probe was received with a tip protector, in a bubble bag along with other items, for the report of air leakage caused actuation failure.The returned sample was visually inspected and found to be non-conforming with orange/brown foreign material on the port.The sample was then functionally tested for actuation, aspiration, and cut.The sample was found to be conforming for cut and aspiration, with no bubbles observed, and was found non-conforming for actuation.The probe sample was disassembled and the components inspected.No/minimal wear was observed on the inner cutter when compared to the degree of wear based on continuous actuation of the probe visual standard photos.No wear marks were observed along the inner cutter.The sample was retested for actuation with the probe driver and was able to actuate.The initial actuation test failed due to an interference within the probe and once the interference (needle assembly) was removed the probe was able to actuate.The complaint evaluation does not confirm that the probe had air leakage, however, the evaluation confirms the probe sample had an actuation failure.The exact cause for the actuation failure cannot be determined from the evaluation performed.No specific action with regard to this complaint was taken by the manufacturing site because the probe sample did not show air leakage and the exact root cause for the observed actuation failure is unknown.All probes are 100% visually inspected and tested for actuation, aspiration, and cut during manufacturing.Complaints will be continued to be reviewed and monitored at regular intervals for any significant adverse trends.No further actions are required.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|