• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION LOTUS EDGE VALVE SYSTEM; LOTUS EDGE TM VALVE SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION LOTUS EDGE VALVE SYSTEM; LOTUS EDGE TM VALVE SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number 10394
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Syncope (1610); Arrhythmia (1721); Chest Pain (1776); Complete Heart Block (2627)
Event Date 08/07/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(6).
 
Event Description
(b)(6) study.It was reported that complete heart block (chb) occurred.The patient was enrolled into the (b)(6) study and the index procedure was performed on the same day.Prior to the index procedure, heparin or other anticoagulant was not given and the patient was on prior regimen of aspirin.A lotus introducer was placed and the aortic valve was treated with balloon valvuloplasty and subsequent deployment of a 25 mm lotus edge valve.Four days post index procedure, the patient developed chb.X-ray and lab tests were performed as diagnostic tests.The patient was hospitalized, medication was adjusted, and a new permanent pacemaker was implanted.That day, the event was considered resolved.Six days post the index procedure, the patient was discharged on aspirin.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A1 patient id (b)(6).E1 initial reporter phone number: (b)(6).
 
Event Description
Respond edge study.It was reported that complete heart block (chb), chest pain and syncope occurred.The patient was enrolled into the respond edge study and the index procedure was performed on the same day.Prior to the index procedure, heparin or other anticoagulant was not given and the patient was on prior regimen of aspirin.A lotus introducer was placed and the aortic valve was treated with balloon valvuloplasty and subsequent deployment of a 25 mm lotus edge valve.Four days post index procedure, the patient developed chb.X-ray and lab tests were performed as diagnostic tests.The patient was hospitalized, medication was adjusted, and a new permanent pacemaker was implanted.That day, the event was considered resolved.Six days post the index procedure, the patient was discharged on aspirin.It was further reported that the patient was discharged one day post index procedure on rivaroxaban.Four days post index procedure, the patient presented with complaints of chest pain, dizziness and syncope.Electrocardiogram revealed left bundle branch block (lbbb).It was then that the patient was diagnosed with chb and had 10 second pauses.The patient was hospitalized, atropine and isoprenaline infusion were given, and the permanent pacemaker was implanted.Six days post index procedure, an electrocardiogram revealed normal sinus rhythm with lbbb.The patient was noted to have made a steady recovery and was considered medically ready for discharge.That day, the patient discharged on aspirin and other anticoagulant.At the patient's six week follow-up with the cardiologist, the patient's condition had gradually improved.The patient mobilized around the house without any significant complaints of chest discomfort or shortness of breath.However, occasional episodes of dizziness were still noted which was presumed to resolve in the following weeks.Aspirin was recommended to be continued and rivaroxaban was withheld.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LOTUS EDGE VALVE SYSTEM
Type of Device
LOTUS EDGE TM VALVE SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
two scimed place
maple grove MN 55311
MDR Report Key10420531
MDR Text Key203326657
Report Number2134265-2020-11242
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/02/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/11/2020
Device Model Number10394
Device Catalogue Number10394
Device Lot Number0025675175
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 08/11/2020
Initial Date FDA Received08/18/2020
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received09/15/2020
Supplement Dates FDA Received10/02/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age90 YR
-
-